Be sure to Click LIKE at the bottom of this article, and share it everywhere!! By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots – Commentary
Last week, on CNN, John Bolton called President Trump, “a cancer on the Republican Party.” Bolton, who was speaking to CNN regarding the indictment against Trump by Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, said of the document itself, “Speaking as someone who very strongly does not want Donald Trump to get the Republican presidential nomination, I’m extraordinarily distressed by this document. I think this is even weaker than I feared it would be.”
Make no mistake, it is not that Bolton is angry that Trump was indicted, it’s that Bolton is mad because the indictment had to be based on thin air, fairy dust and unicorn farts.
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, a democrat, said last week that the indictment of Trump was a “legal slurpee.” To be exact, what Turley said was, “I have never seen an indictment quite like this one. I know a lot of judges that would have been not too pleased to receive an indictment like this and would have said, ‘you know, what the heck is this? I mean, what are you alleging? And [Manhattan District Attorney Alvin] Bragg just sort of waved it off and said I don’t have to really say. But my question is how did the grand jury understand what it was doing? We will see a little better with the bill of particulars. But it really raises concerns as to how well the grand jury understood these key linchpins because this thing has the feeling of like a legal slurpee. It’s instantly satisfying but it has no nutritional value, there is really nothing there.”
So, how much of nothing is there in that indictment?