This Article is Co-Written by Diane Sori
And so Barack HUSSEIN Obama went against NOT only long-standing U.S. policy NEVER to negotiate with terrorists but as Craig explained in Part 2 of our expose, Obama circumnavigated set law and Congress to do so. Now defending his decision to have secret and indirect negotiations
with the Taliban, and hoping that the Bergdahl deal would set an example for cooperation between the Taliban and the secular government, Obama unilaterally decided that the five now released terrorists were well-worth the trade for Bowe Bergdahl, and did so by using the excuse that the deal was part of America’s “iron-clad commitment to bringing our prisoners home.”
An ‘ironclad commitment’ that Obama ignored for five long years until he needed it for his own political expediency…as in to divert attention off the ever expanding Benghazi and VA scandals and investigations.
Also saying that “The Qatari government has given us assurances that it will put in place measures to protect our national security” what we want to know is who does Obama think he is to leave the protecting of our national security to a foreign government…even a foreign government that acted as the go-between in the Bergdahl release…especially a foreign government that has NOT always been friendly to the U.S.
Let’s have a look at the pattern of behavior regarding our 2nd Amendment presented by the Obama administration for a moment.
Dear Nobel Peace Prize Committee,
For the last couple of days, I have outlined, here in The National Patriot, the foreign policy of this Obama regime related to Syria and I have tied in Benghazi, Gaddafi, Egypt and offered evidence that the WMD attacks in Syria were carried out by Syrian “rebels.”
Well…Another week of EPIC socialist stupidity in the can.
Seriously.
It’s time to connect the dots and look at the bigger picture.
We can’t be policing the whole world.