Last night, The National Patriot was pleased to go LIVE with Jo Anne Moretti and Liberty Underground for a special Moretti Report radio interview!
While the focus was on the Judge Mahili decision out of Georgia regarding Obama’s eligibility to be on that state’s ballot, we also covered a few other topics as well.
Our thanks to Jo Anne and Liberty Underground!!
For the article on Ginsburg and how her comments could be used to hold Romney accountable, please click here!
“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012.”
Those are the words of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, United States Supreme Court Justice. Ginsburg didn’t stop there either.
“You should certainly be aided by all the constitution-writing that has gone one since the end of World War II.”
“I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary.”
Here are a few other words once spoken by Ginsburg which damn well should be noted.
“I, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
She has quite a unique way of supporting and defending our Constitution, doesn’t she?
As allies, Israel and the United States should be so close together one could not slip a single sheet of paper between the two.
In the face of Iranian threats against Israel, that piece of paper should be reduced in thickness by a property of ten and still not fit between the nation of Israel and the United States.
Should we act on behalf of Israel? No. Israel is perfectly capable to act on their own and they have never once asked us to defend them, act for them or take the lead in their issues.
None the less, we should be there, with them, side by side never flinching, never blinking.
As things now stand, this is not the case.
Last week, in reported comments, Leon Panetta made that abundantly clear.
With the ruling by Judge Malihi in Georgia that Obama will remain on the ballot, tyranny has been established.
How else does one describe it when the President is above the law?
A court issues a subpoena to the President which is ignored.
The court rules against a motion to dismiss.
The attorney for the defendant, Obama, states he will not participate or provide subpoenaed material.
The Georgia Secretary of State says such action will be at the attorney’s and his client’s peril.
The hearing proceeds with the only evidence and testimony presented being against the defendant.
One week later, the Judge finds in favor of the defendant.
Clearly, speculation will be forthcoming. How did this happen? Was the Judge bought? Was he threatened? Was it all fixed before the hearing ever happened?
People will want to know the background of the Judge.
I’m SURE there are some coincidences involved.
BREAKING NEWS!!!
Today, in Las Vegas, Donald Trump WILL endorse Mitt Romney. Even through early morning, it was thought the endorsement would go to Gingrich but, it has now been confirmed…it’s Romney.
How much weight does a Trump endorsement carry?
Maybe not as much as one would think.
While Trump draws a crowd wherever he goes and hitting the campaign trail for Mitt would be a draw, outside that, little if any effect is likely to be seen.
Yes, Trump adds bankroll but there is another effect that may work against Romney regarding the Trump endorsement.
Adding Donald Trump to the list of Romney endorsements is simply adding yet another moderate.
Bob Dole, John McCain, Jon Huntsman, Chris Christie…all endorsing Mitt Romney, none looked at by core conservatives and solid conservatives.
Trump in fact, recently changed his voter registration from Republican to undeclared and has for months, even after bailing out of the race, hinted at a possible independent run for the White House.
Doesn’t sound much like a dyed-in-the-wool conservative, does it?
One thing made clear by the upcoming endorsement today is that Trump will not be making that independent run after all.
Since my article regarding the blow-by-blow account of the Georgia hearing on Obama’s eligibility to appear on that state’s ballot, one question has surfaced more than any other. This is a question which has been posed to me via social media, email and within the nearly 600 comments on that article.
The question is a simple one and a valid one.
Why has there been no media coverage of this?
Clearly, it’s a story.
A sitting President gets subpoenaed. Story.
A sitting President’s ability to be on a state’s ballot at risk. Story.
A sitting president’s attempt to dismiss the case denied. Story.
A sitting president ignores the subpoena. Story.
A sitting President’s attorney sends letter to Georgia Sec. of State saying he won’t participate. Story.
Sec. of State says don’t participate at your own risk. Story.
Hearing takes place, witnesses testify and evidence is presented with no refute from Sitting President’s attorney. Story.
NO MEDIA COVERAGE??? Story.
First, let’s have a look at the media.
The alphabet networks, also known as the mainstream or elite media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC etc. are all in the can for Obama or in his pocket. We all know that.
Why would they all of a sudden cover a story so potentially harmful to the guy who sends shivers up their collective legs?
This is the media arm of the Obama administration after all. These are the very people who refused to vet candidate Obama and anointed him their supreme leader. They went all in. They shielded Obama during the campaign, they have provided cover during his 3 years in office, they’ve been outwardly dismissive of any mention of his eligibility, they’ve labeled any who question it as nuts, mobs, terrorists, and worse.
At this point, when it actually gains a hearing before a judge and neither Obama nor his attorney show up even under subpoena, why would they now lend credibility to it?
How exactly does one go about constructing a Constitutional crisis?
It can’t be done easily and it takes a concerted effort to contradict the very framework of our nation.
Obama is in the midst of such a creation.
If Georgia Judge, the Hon. Michael Malihi, returns a verdict disallowing Obama’s name from the Georgia ballot, a Constitutional crisis could well be the outcome. The threat of such an event can be no reason to issue a ruling which would avoid it.
In last week’s Georgia hearing, neither Obama nor his attorney were present. Obama was campaigning in Nevada and his attorney, Michael Jablonski, issued to the Georgia Sec. of State the previous day, his intention of non participation.
Regardless of the outcome and the decision of the Judge, an appeal will certainly follow and should the Judge rule against Obama, expect an injunction to be filed preventing the Georgia Sec. of State from taking action to remove Obama from the ballot.
One of the things which is sure to be brought into play by Jablonski is Executive Privilege.
It will be claimed that Obama, as sitting President, has the Executive Privilege to ignore the subpoena of the court.
We believe this will be met with resistance by the legal team for the plaintiffs.
Carter Braxton, Thomas Malaren, John Hart, David Farrar, Thomas Lynch Jr., Leah Lax, George Read, Laurie Roth, Lewis Morris, David Weldon, Stephen Hopkins, Carl Swensson, William Ellery and Kevin Richard Powell.
Who are they?
In a word…Patriots.
Braxton, Hart, Lynch Jr., Read, Morris, Hopkins and Ellery were among the 56 who signed their names to the Declaration of Independence.
The others, Malaren, Farrar, Lax, Roth, Weldon, Swensson and Powell…Patriots too.
The latter group were the plaintiffs, last Thursday in a courtroom in Atlanta, Georgia, as Obama’s eligibility to appear on that state’s ballot was held.
Were the 56 a great deal different than the 7?
No.
The 56 gave birth to a nation of laws and stated their case in the Declaration. That nation was, via the Constitution, entrusted to the people.
The 7, guided by the Constitution, are carrying the torch having stated their case in a Georgia courtroom.
Is it really Friday already?
I just got over LAST week’s bout of fuming and here we are at the end of another week of liberal/socialist inane blather.
Fear not Patriots, even though it seems to have crept up on us like a cheap pair of tighty whities,
It’s Friday and…
I’m fuming.
“He’s not going to ask me to stay on, I’m pretty confident. I’m confident he’ll be president. But I’m also confident he’s going to have the privilege of having another secretary of the Treasury.”
Those were the words of Timmy Tax Dodger a few days ago.
Who would have thought, just a couple years ago, that a guy who DIDN’T PAY HIS TAXES AND WAS PUT IN CHARGE OF THE TREASURY WOULD BE THE LEAST OFFENSIVE OF THE EMPEROR’S MINIONS???
Can’t we get ERIC HOLDER to make a FAST AND FURIOUS DEPARTURE???
Now we get THIS from Hillary…
She wants to “step off the high wire of American politics.”
AREN’T THE RATS ALWAYS THE FIRST TO JUMP OFF A SINKING SHIP???
Ol’ Hillary says she’ll stay on ’til the Emperor nominates somebody else for the State Department post and given his STERLING RECORD OF NOMINEES…one has to wonder where he’ll find a replacement.
Tomorrow, a storm will strike in Georgia. It could well be a storm of epic proportions. It will be a political storm from which a Constitutional crisis could well arise.
It will take place in a Georgia courtroom.
Obama’s eligibility to serve as President is on the line.
It’s been a long and hard road for Dr. Orly Taitz and the Liberty Legal Foundation, which will represent the plaintiffs in court tomorrow, what they have been working toward may well create the perfect storm.
Make no mistake, while the outcome of this case is at the state level, and while it will not, if successful by the plaintiffs, remove Obama from office, it could set the stage for that ultimate showdown.
This case, brought forth in Georgia, will decide, before appeals, whether or not Obama is qualified, by virtue of the constitution, to appear on Georgia’s ballot in 2012.
This IS huge.
There are other such cases being formulated and one, in the state of California, which is pending.
The case against Obama’s eligibility hinges on the definition of “Natural Born Citizen” and the constitution clearly states one must BE a Natural Born Citizen in order to serve as president.