In yesterday’s Weekend Edition, I outlined the desperation of last week’s New York Times attempt to provide cover by reintroducing that lame and false You Tube fabrication for the Benghazi attacks.
I also kicked down the door as to who would have HAD to be involved, why and to what ends.
I went so far as to expose the preemptive nature behind the cover story AND the actions of 8 Democrats in the house.
If you missed it…Have a look at the truly disgusting nature of those who would conspire, collude, commit and cover up acts of TREASON.
But, I said there was more and, there is.
To truly delve into the desperate nature of liberals, Obama, his administration, Hillary and the New York Times…One must fully realize how far the Times is willing to go and why.
Last week, The NY Times released an editorial regarding Benghazi and that You Tube video ass covering story stating: “Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.”
The Times didn’t stop there.
Oh…SOMEBODY is TRULY desperate…
Last Thursday, they actually made a claim SO outrageous, SO absurd, that it defies common sense and DEFINES desperation.
As their latest effort at providing some sort of “reasonable” doubt for any upcoming trial of either Hillary, Obama or BOTH was falling apart due to REAL FACTS garnered from SWORN TESTIMONY provided by CIA BENGHAZI SURVIVORS behind the closed doors of the house oversight committee…
The author of the You Tube story last week, one David Kirkpatrick: “[W]e had a reporter on the scene talking to the attackers during the attack- still invaluable”
That’s right…The NEW YORK TIMES claimed that they had a reporter…ON THE GROUND…IN BENGHAZI…DURING THE ATTACKS who WITNESSED those attacks.
How FORTUNATE yes? That the NEW YORK TIMES…by coincidence(?) had a REPORTER…IN BENGHAZI
…AT JUST THE RIGHT MOMENT AND IN JUST THE RIGHT PLACE…TO INTERVIEW THE ATTACKERS…WHILE AMBASSADOR STEVENS…GLEN DOHERTY…SEAN SMITH AND TYRONE WOODS…WERE BEING MURDERED!!!
Seems rather implausible doesn’t it.
Maybe they had ADVANCED KNOWLEDGE OF THE ATTACK SO AS TO HAVE SOMEONE THERE, IN THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT TIME…To get the scoop.
Speaking OF the scoop…WHERE WAS IT? On September 11th, 2012…Do YOU remember a breaking, exclusive article from the NY TIMES provided by THE ONLY WESTERN REPORTER WHO JUST HAPPENED TO BE RIGHT THERE…TALKING DIRECTLY WITH…THE TERRORISTS???
Nope. Me either.
Do you recall such a major and earth shattering article from the NY Times on September 12th, 2012? The 13th? The 14th???
EVER???
Nope. Me either.
Don’t bother asking the PULITZER PRIZE COMMITTEE…Had THEY heard of it or read such an account of THE BREAKING 
STORY in the CLOSING MONTHS of the 2012 campaign that would have EXONERATED SUSAN “5 SUNDAY SHOWS” RICE…OBAMA AND HILLARY…THAT reporter would be in FAT CITY today.
Making up THAT piece of utter BS just days after the BS story that it wasn’t al Qaeda at ALL involved in the Benghazi attacks is THE PUREST DEFINITION of DESPERATION I have ever encountered.
But…Why DO it?
As much as this NYT absurdity was to cover the wide and skinny asses of Hillary and Obama for colluding in treason…Aiding and abetting the enemy in a time of war by running covert weapons from Libyan al Qaeda “rebels to SYRIAN al Qaeda rebels…It is meant to take the heat off those with whom Hillary and Obama were rolling about in bed.
Al Qaeda themselves.
Think about it…
Obama and Hillary supply Ansar al Sharia (Libya;s al Qaeda) with weapons to take out Gaddafi thus leaving Libya under the 
defacto control OF our enemy, al Qaeda and then…They want those weapons back so as to hand them over to al Qaeda in Syria to oust Assad and leave SYRIA in the hands of our enemy…al Qaeda but, Ansar al Sharia doesn’t want to turn in those weapons and, I believe, Stevens was about to blow the whistle on the whole thing.
The attack by Ansar al Sharia in September, 2012 was, I believe, set into motion by Obama, Jarrett and Hiallary as their way of saying “OH, HELL NO…WE’RE not going down for this as a way to eliminate Stevens and 3 other Americans also paid the ultimate price of the deal gone bad.
At that point, Obama, unable to make good on the Syrian end of the deal…Has a bunch of really pissed off “rebels” over there so, what does he do?
He tries to GO TO WAR AGAINST ASSAD TO LEAD FROM THE FRONT AND HAND SYRIA TO AL QAEDA.
What happens?
Putin happens and again, Obama is unable to deliver Syria to al Qaeda.
Obama couldn’t keep his promise to turn Egypt over to the Muslim Brotherhood NOR could he keep his promise to turn Syria over to al Qaeda.
Treason makes for ugly bedfellows, doesn’t it?
It is nowhere near outside the 
realm of possibility, that both the Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda, being on the losing end of the Obama Doctrine’s broken promises, are threatening to EXPOSE everything they know about our Dictator therefore…OBAMA is in DESPERATE need of having heat of Benghazi lifted from himself and those with whom he and Hillary were aiding and abetting.
Do you really think it’s just a coincidence that, at the same time these ridiculous fabrications from the NY Times hit print…Obama is in Hawaii with the press being held at bay?
Do you really think it’s a coincidence that while the REAL EVIDENCE of what went down in Benghazi is told to congressional investigators this BS cover story rears its ugly head again?
Do you really think that, just months from making her ambitions for 2016 public and official, it’s a coincidence that such a story comes from the Propaganda Times to take the heat off of Hillary and HER role in TREASON.
Do you really find it a coincidence that, with news of the “rebels” of al Qaeda getting their hats handed to them in Syria by Assad, that the NY Times would try to ease al Qaeda tensions due to the flood of intel being provided by the survivors of Benghazi?
Do you really think it coincidence that while all of this ass covering is going on and stealing headlines…John “traitor” Kerry is trying like all hell to keep Obama’s “deal” with Iran intact long enough for Iran to enrich enough uranium to build a nuke while, at the same time, he’s trying to convince Israel to stand down the way Obama had any hope of rescue for those in Benghazi stand down?
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS COINCIDENCE IN THE WORLD OF POLITICS!!!
The Obama Doctrine has always been to hand the entirety of the Middle East to al Qaeda and have Israel eliminated but time for the Dictator is growing short. His promises to the scum of the earth have gone unfulfilled. He’s been caught in his own treasonous web of lies, betrayal and murder.
The New York TIMES is not d
esperate…OBAMA is, and now, in abject desperation, he has had his propaganda puppets, the New York Times, publish absurdities and lies in a last ditch effort to provide the thinnest of threads of “reasonable” doubt to try and save his own hide.
When things head to hell in a hand basket for a Dictator…When the TRUTH is TOO HOT TO HANDLE…Dictators always…ALWAYS…Fall back on their propaganda ministers to spread the lies…Whatever lies are needed at the moment, to cover for the Dictator’s unlawful actions.
THAT is why, I believe, the NEW YORK TIMES ran with this absurd lie that al Qaeda was not involved in the Benghazi attacks.
If they can plant “reasonable” doubt in the eyes of the justice system…If they can get some to believe that al Qaeda wasn’t involved…Obama just might escape a charge and/or conviction for TREASON and MURDER as he could then claim he wasn’t supplying arms or running arms with those responsible for the killings of Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.
And why would the Propaganda Times agree to try and take the heat off of al Qaeda?
BECAUSE…If these lies, concocted by Obama and his minions take even a LITTLE of the heat off of AL QAEDA…The terrorist networks just may hold Obama’s secrets a little longer.
And then there’s the wildcard.
If Kerry can buy Iran enough time for the Obama Doctrine to come to fruition while keeping Israel at bay…Maybe, just maybe, Iran won’t spill Obama’s secret beans either.
Obama won’t think twice about throwing Hillary under the bus if it means HE has even the thinnest thread of plausible deniability in this treachery.
And the Times had better watch their spineless backs because, as soon as Obama realizes that We the People are onto THEIR lies…He” discard them like yesterday’s news.
It is despicable…Absolutely disgusting…That what was once a respected outlet of journalism has lowered itself to being the propaganda puppets at the whim of he who holds a once respected office and has lowered himself to being a treasonous Dictator but, that is exactly, in my opinion, what the NY Times has done.
The only thin
gs transparent about “the most transparent” presidency in history is his hatred for America and his love of Islamist terrorists.
Remember…
OBAMA LEFT 4 AMERICANS TO DIE IN BENGHAZI AFTER GIVING BIN LADEN A RESPECTFUL MUSLIM BURIAL AT SEA!!!
Craig Andresen
The National Patriot
Weekend Edition 1/5/2014
Great pair of articles Craig. Someone needs to keep their feet at the fire of Bengahzi and all the rest or it will go away.