Doing the U.N. Two Step

In his speech before the U.N. General Assembly this morning, President Obama managed to dance around the truth over and over again. It should come as no surprise that his inferences were more striking than his words.

In several parts of his address, Obama stroked the U.N.,  inferring it is the only entity upon which the world can depend to bring about world peace. Obama said, that to achieve world peace, “We must return to the wisdom of those who created this institution.”

Several times, Obama patted the U.N. on the back for their actions over the past year. He stroked them for their actions in Libya, in Egypt and other parts of the world. While he didn’t come right out and state it, the inference was that the U.N. should be the go-to entity for all international issues.

For those “cynical” enough to believe Obama wants to promote a One World Government or a New World Order, his address this morning will no doubt add fuel to the fire. For critics of the cynics to dismiss the cynics will take the willful ignoring of yet more red flags.

Continue reading

0

Beware of Presidents Wearing False Yarmulkes

This week, with a major U.N. assembly taking place, there seems to be a great deal of behind the scenes scrambling to prevent Palestinian statehood. Scrambling is the key word. Why exactly are we scrambling? Should we not have taken the steps we now scramble to take months ago?

The scrambling is to form a multi-nation block of statehood for Palestine so that the U.S. does not stand alone in the U.N. Security Council in opposition to Palestinian statehood.

This should have been a done deal a long, long time ago but that isn’t the case. It seems that Obama promised Palestinian Authority leader Abbas that Palestine would indeed gain recognition and statehood upon which now, Obama seems to have reversed course.

Continue reading

0

Obama’s Economic Plan is Pure Genius!!

Yesterday, on the Sunday talking heads shows from one end of the channel spectrum to the other, Republicans lined up to tell us how the Obama plan, to be revealed today, is “Class Warfare.” At first blush, I admit that it looks like class warfare – but with sincere apologies to the likes of Karl Rove and Paul Ryan, They couldn’t be more wrong.

Today, Obama will unveil the latest segment of his plan to fix everything from unemployment and a tanked economy to the deficit and the heartbreak of psoriasis.

It’s not class warfare.

It’s a domestic kinetic action.

Obama, on the heels of announcing the$450 billion dollar American Jobs Act, which he said was completely paid for, will finally tell us HOW he intends to pay for it.

Tax hikes.

Well, don’t think of it as tax hikes…Think of it instead, as New Revenue.

Continue reading

0

Obama, Solyndra and the Spastic Monkey Approach to Lying

As the Solyndra scandal hit the news a couple of weeks ago, the Obama administration obviously knew that they were in trouble. With Obama’s polling figures sinking already, the economy in the tank, the first downgrade in our nation’s history having just been handed down, unemployment still high and for the first time in decades, a month in which not a single new job had been created, Obama could not afford a hit like Solyndra.

Obama, his administration and liberals in general have, once again, resorted to a worn out strategy.

Blame Bush.

Continue reading

0

Mt. Obama is Rumbling

As conservatives, there is a question to which we must seek an answer. Have we been wasting our time trying to bring down this current administration? Liberals will no doubt believe we’ve seen the light if we answer yes and a chorus of “I told you so” will ring loudly from the left.

So, HAVE we been wasting time and effort? It would seem that maybe…MAYBE we have. Happy liberals rejoice.

Ummm…not so fast.

We MAY have been wasting our time because it is now beginning to seem like we didn’t need to help. This administration is starting to bring itself down, crumbling before our eyes, imploding. Stand back…the debris field is gonna be huge!

Continue reading

0

Obama’s Pandering Puppet Act

Last night’s “American Jobs Act” speech by Obama was THE most transparently obvious reelection campaign example of political pandering I have ever witnessed.

We all wondered why he decided to present this bill to a joint session of congress and why the nationally televised broadcast? Such things are State of the Union or declaration of war moments…not economic policy moments.

The answer revealed itself throughout the speech last night.

To fully understand it, one must think back a few weeks, to shortly before the Martha’s Vineyard vacation.

Unions.

Unions were talking openly about withdrawing their heavy support of Obama for 2012. Unions were upset, thinking this administration had turned away from them in Wisconsin, Ohio and elsewhere. Unions felt that Obama wasn’t doing enough to defend their tactics.

Continue reading

0

Giving Obama His Due Respect!!

Never has such an anticipated speech by a President been so completely forgettable before it’s even been presented. Obama will deliver his great jobs speech before a joint session of congress and while liberals will no doubt stand and applaud at every little thing and will cheer each at every spending measure Obama announces, the response will be silent and that silence will be deafening!!

Republicans expect so little from this ballyhooed speech that they have already decided not to even offer a rebuttal.

Nancy Pelosi, deposed from the speaker’s chair last November is not happy about it either. Nancy has her former speaker’s panties all wadded up as she has let it be known that such a non rebuttal is an affront to the President.

Oh my.

Presidents speak before a joint session of congress for the State of the Union or if they want to wage war. Outside of that, such a speech is rarely given especially on matters of domestic economics.

Continue reading

0

Obama Takes Another Swing

So, Obama has finally set the time and place for his big economic plan speech and wouldn’t ya know it, was going to be on the same night and at the same time as a republican candidate’s debate. Oh, he said it was just a coincidence of scheduling and certainly not, as some in the media and around the blogesphere believed, a direct sign of disrespect and a transparent political move.

Of course it wasn’t – but  Boehner said no way, due to “security” reasons, and now it’s been reset for Thursday evening September 8th where it will compete against the opening night of the NFL.

Now, those in the media and on various blogs are all talking about how Obama blinked and the republicans got their way and they are comparing this upcoming speech to his speech to rally support for Obamacare because THAT speech ALSO took place before a joint session of congress.

They’re missing the true point of this whole thing.

Continue reading

0

The Shameful Liberal Approach to 9-11

Enough is ENOUGH when it comes to this administration. Obama and his band of malcontented anti-American fools are again trying to divert history and are willing to blather from both sides of their mouths in the process.

As we approach the 10th anniversary of the attacks of 9-11, this administration has issued 2 sets of talking points regarding how to commemorate this very personal day.

One set of blather points is for those in foreign lands and the other is for those who reside in the United States.

Both are disgusting.

Continue reading

0

Who Makes a Federal Case of Their Own Scam?

Is the Federal Election Commission about to open a back door to legitimize naturalized citizens to run for President? It sure seems like it.

Naturalized citizens are U.S. citizens born outside the U.S and who have become citizens through the citizenship process. Our constitution states that only those born in the U.S. can serve as President, natural born citizens but never indicates what constitutes a natural born citizen. That definition can be found in the U.S. code and has been the subject, over the years, of several challenges.

Nationals and Citizens of the United States at birth.
“The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;
(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;
(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;
(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;
(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person
(A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or
(B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and
(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.”

This, however, is different.

What we have here is someone, Abdul Hassan, who was born in Guyana, who wants to RUN for President…not SERVE as President.

Huh?

Well, if this fellow can RUN…he can collect campaign donations and MAY be in line to receive matching federal funds for his…”campaign.”

On the face of it, it seems like someone looking for a way to simply scam the system doesn’t it? In fact, it could well be much, MUCH more than that.

The FEC will meet later this week to take up this matter and 4 of the 6 members OF that commission would have to approve of it for Hassan to to begin his candidacy and or receive those matching funds. It seems unlikely but, stranger things have happened and let’s face it, while the constitution states plainly that only a natural born citizen can SERVE, it mentions noting about…RUNNING…so…what could possibly go wrong?

Should a legal case be filed regarding Hussan’s “candidacy” there is little doubt that it would eventually find its way to the U.S. Supreme court. It certainly would not get to that level before the 2012 election but, that may well not be the point.

For such a challenge to reach the Supreme Court, it would have to work its way through the legal system of trials, challenges and appeals which would not be inexpensive. While little is known at this point regarding this Hussan chap, it’s a fair bet such a protracted court case would be something to which the ACLU would hitch ITS little red wagon…pro bono…of course.

It is pretty difficult to discern who leads who. Is it the ACLU which leads the liberal cause or the liberals who lead the ACLU? Either way, the two go hand in hand and such a challenge would, without doubt, have to include a challenge to the very definition of…”natural born” citizen as accepted to date from the U.S. code.

In this maneuver, liberals, depending on the make-up of the Supreme Court at the time such a case arrives on it’s bench, could well open the door to a change in that definition and a possible back door to a person born elsewhere to not only run, but serve as President.

Realizing there are a whole lot of hypotheticals in this scenario and the fact it appears conspiratorial, one must pause to note that chipping away at the constitution, and for that matter, the codes contained in U.S. law regarding the guidelines of conventional wisdom is exactly what the liberals are about and exactly what the ACLU thrives upon.

Okay, what if the FEC rules against Hussan later this week? Does it end there? Probably not as his legal team could challenge a negative ruling in court thus starting the process of working it through the legal system.

As long as the what if scenario is in play here, we should look at a more plausible outcome of changing the U.S. code definition of “natural born” citizen.

While liberals continue to be dismissive of “birthers” there are still interesting, if not legitimate concerns over the Obama birth certificate. There are some things contained ON the certificate which have raised eyebrows and questions of its authenticity. For instance, Obama’s father’s race is listed as African  on the certificate he and liberals tout as authentic.

Was, “African” ever considered a race? The term of the day was Negro but the certificate doesn’t say Negro, it says…African.  Here’s another curiosity. Obama’s father’s place of birth is listed on the “authentic” certificate as, Kenya, East Africa. Curious…considering that in 1962, Kenya did not yet exist anymore than did, African was considered a race.

The East Africa Protectorate became Kenya in 1963 but the year that the birth certificate was supposedly issued was 1962. Yes, technically, that region was sometimes referred to as the Kenya Colony but the certificate doesn’t state, Kenya Colony OR East Africa Protectorate, it clearly states…Kenya, East Africa.

So, IF questions persist, and one can believe questions WILL persist over Obama’s place of birth and IF he should, at some point be discovered NOT to have been a “natural born” citizen of the United States at the time of his birth…what of his Presidency?

It could become a situation where any law bearing Obama’s signature would be called into question, a constitutional crisis could result and such laws could be found null and void. IF Obama was NOT by law, eligible to serve as President, any law which was signed by him could be illegitimate as well.

Change the definition of “natural born” and his signature, and the laws bearing it could also stand.

Share these scenarios with a liberal and when they’re done being derisive and after they’ve finished questioning everything from your intelligence to your stand on racial equality, remind them that this fellow, Hassan, HAS taken his quest to claim candidacy for President to the FEC then ask them why, if he’s just trying to scam the system, he would WANT to make a federal case out of it?

Their responses should be pretty entertaining.

Here’s an idea. Why not make so that matching funds can only be received by someone eligible to SERVE as President and if one is silly enough to donate their own money to a candidate INELIGIBLE to serve…lesson learned.

Action filed by Hussan

Hussan for President site

0