How’s that again?
Seriously…Did Obama REALLY say that???
“I think we have both a moral obligation and a national security interest in both a) ending the slaughter in Syria and b) ensuring a stable Syria.”
Yes.
That is exactly what he said.
So…NOW he wants to talk about “MORAL OBLIGATIONS???”
Okay…
Let’s talk about “MORAL OBLIGATIONS.”
HILLARY CLINTON had a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to ensure that our diplomats were protected in Libya.
Under HER “leadership,” no doubt guided by her “MORAL OBLIGATIONS,” our security personnel in Libya, specifically Benghazi, were drawn DOWN.
Under her “MORAL OBLIGATION” to ensure their safety…
Dear Nobel Peace Prize Committee,
There has been a number of inane comments made by the Obama administration regarding the desire to launch an attack on Syria but, perhaps the most brainless to date was uttered by Nancy Pelosi.
For the last couple of days, I have outlined, here in The National Patriot, the foreign policy of this Obama regime related to Syria and I have tied in Benghazi, Gaddafi, Egypt and offered evidence that the WMD attacks in Syria were carried out by Syrian “rebels.”
The liberal “there were no WMD in Iraq” crowd is being suspiciously silent right now as their chosen one, Obama, is about to launch military strikes against Syria’s Assad.
It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad, MAD world.
I have our CHRISTMAS lights up…we got our CHRISTMAS tree up and decorated with CHRISTMAS ornaments and we sent our CHRISTMAS cards out to our troops.