The Witch Hunt Exposed

Be sure to Click LIKE at the bottom of this article, and share it everywhere!! By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots – Commentary

Last week, on CNN, John Bolton called President Trump, “a cancer on the Republican Party.” Bolton, who was speaking to CNN regarding the indictment against Trump by Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, said of the document itself, “Speaking as someone who very strongly does not want Donald Trump to get the Republican presidential nomination, I’m extraordinarily distressed by this document. I think this is even weaker than I feared it would be.”

Make no mistake, it is not that Bolton is angry that Trump was indicted, it’s that Bolton is mad because the indictment had to be based on thin air, fairy dust and unicorn farts.

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, a democrat, said last week that the indictment of Trump was a “legal slurpee.” To be exact, what Turley said was, “I have never seen an indictment quite like this one. I know a lot of judges that would have been not too pleased to receive an indictment like this and would have said, ‘you know, what the heck is this? I mean, what are you alleging? And [Manhattan District Attorney Alvin] Bragg just sort of waved it off and said I don’t have to really say. But my question is how did the grand jury understand what it was doing? We will see a little better with the bill of particulars. But it really raises concerns as to how well the grand jury understood these key linchpins because this thing has the feeling of like a legal slurpee. It’s instantly satisfying but it has no nutritional value, there is really nothing there.”

So, how much of nothing is there in that indictment?

Continue reading

Iran Exposed…The Evidence is In

By: Craig Andresen and Diane Sori / American Political Radio

“Iran lied.”
– Two words spoken by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that says it all…two words presented with definitive truth to back those words up.

And not only did Benjamin Netanyahu back them up, but immediately after the presentation officials from the Trump administration confirmed the authenticity of the very nuclear documents he presented as truth. In fact, President Trump himself praised Benjamin Netanyahu for disclosing the thousands of secret documents…documents encompassing what Iran called ‘Project Amad’…proving that Iran not only lied about its nuclear ambitions being peaceful, but that they violated the very so-called “landmark” nuclear deal they claim to have upheld.

And Prime Minister Netanyahu’s public disclosure truly makes it impossible for President Trump to allow the U.S. to remain in Obama’s 2015 very bad nuclear deal…a deal Trump has called “the worst deal ever”…as also including in his presentation was documentation showing the scope and scale to which Iran tried to hide their ever deceitful actions before they signed onto the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action).

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-6HaXI4RoeEQ/WupMvKTX0sI/AAAAAAAAsq0/DtnXlJBQDoolrdvFwKSFtM5EwkPQOq1tQCLcBGAs/s200/lie%2Bcover%2Buse.PNGNetanyahu’s presentation titled Atomic Archive: Iran’s Secret Nuclear Files…and given in English live from Israeli military headquarters in Tel Aviv…confirmed that “new details in this information are consistent with a large body of evidence and intelligence the U.S. government has amassed over many years on Iran’s past clandestine nuclear weapons program,” and that while the administration’s analysis of the documents now being presented to the public is “ongoing,” the Trump administration “agrees with the Israelis that…this information provides new and compelling details about Iran’s past efforts to develop nuclear weapons deliverable by a Shahab-3 ballistic missile.”

And Netanyahu affirmed that said “information indicates plans for Iran’s nuclear weapons program included building five nuclear weapons”…weapons he compared to five Hiroshima bombs…with Israel and the United States being assumed as their likely destinations…and that, “It demonstrates once again that Iranian leaders have for years lied to the world and their own citizens when they claim Iran has never pursued nuclear weapons.” But this is something we suspected all along…something Obama not only knew but aided Iran in doing while knowingly and willingly pushing forward a deal not in America’s…not in the world’s…best interest… something we believe he must now answer for.

“Iran has systematically hid evidence of clandestine weapons work from international inspectors,” is the word now coming from administration officials, but it goes way deeper than that for the 100,000+ documents, (55,000 pages and 55,000 files, charts, blueprints, plus photos) and 183 CDs Netanyahu has in his possession for “safe keeping”…what he calls a “half ton” of Iranian documents…proves that Iran deliberately, calculatingly and with malice intended, hid from the world an “atomic archive” of documents on its true nuclear program and ambitions.

“This is an original Iranian presentation from these files,” Netanyahu said about his presentation while stressing that “the mission statement is to design, produce and test five warheads with 10 kiloton of TNT yield for integration on missiles.” Dangerous stuff indeed…stuff thankfully “appropriated,” if you will, when the Israeli Mossad raided a “secret location” in the Tehran neighborhood of Shourabad…a location discovered back in February 2016 and kept under tight Israeli surveillance since then…a location that looked on the outside like nothing more than a “dilapidated warehouse.”

Taking those original documents and smuggling them back to Israel on the same night…a night this past February not January as some news sites are reporting as per Netanyahu’s Tuesday May 1st Fox and Friends Interview…was a “great intelligence achievement” as per Netanyahu, proving once again that no one should ever doubt the reach or the abilities of Israel’s Mossad.

And know that President Trump was briefed about the raid itself during Mossad Chief Yossi Cohen’s most recent visit to D.C., and was informed of the actual contents of the “appropriated” documents when Netanyahu met in the Oval Office with Trump on March 5th. Also telling Trump all would be exposed after both Israel and the U.S. together translated, assessed, and analyzed said documents, most of which were in Farsi…the two true leaders of the free world also spoke by phone on April 28th to discuss how Israel would make that information public.

And this past Monday, April 30th that information became part of the public discourse.

“Iran lied about never having a secret nuclear program. Secondly, even after the deal, it continued to expand its nuclear program for future use. Thirdly, Iran lied by not coming clean to the IAEA,” Netanyahu said as he summed up the findings, adding that, “the nuclear deal is based on lies based on Iranian deception.”

Simply put…the Iranian nuclear deal was an overt act of ‘taqiyya’ both by Iran and the man who pushed a little too hard for it…Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

And as the Iranian regime continues to lie to the world about its ultimate nuclear ambitions…and as Benjamin Netanyahu says he will share this information with both our Western allies and with the IAEA (the International Atomic Energy Agency), Europe’s leaders continue to urge President Trump not to abandon the deal for fear that not only would the U.S. then be the only signatory of the deal who is out of compliance, but that by being so Iran could now openly restart it’s nuclear weapons program not waiting until the now in place restrictions on uranium enrichment expire in 2025.

In other words, the European leaders are trying to convince President Trump that Iran holds the ‘trump card’ not the U.S…and to that we say Europe is playing a foolhardy game indeed…more on that in a bit.

And so in the wake of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech it was not at all surprising that major world players reacted in favor of keeping the nuclear deal in place with so many saying the deal such as it is, is a way to “keep Iran honest” regarding their nuclear ambitions.

In using that particular avenue of illogic what various world leaders are actually saying is that they trust the most untrustworthy rogue nation in the entire region…if not the world…to abide by a deal to limit their nuclear ambitions…nuclear weapons ambitions they bold faced lied about when striking the deal itself.

Let us explain…Iran has claimed, despite the evidence presented by Benjamin Netanyahu, that they had abandoned their nuclear weapons ambitions back in 2003. Obviously, as the documentation now clearly shows, Iran was still engaged in both research and nuclear weapons development programs right up until the deal. In fact, in an effort to preserve their past research…the previously stated Project Amad…Iran moved their now exposed nuclear weapons research files to what they believed to be a more secure location just last year…some two years after the deal was made.

Interesting move from a rogue nation whose leaders claimed they had no interest in or intention of building nuclear weapons. So what this means is that even while “negotiating,” and we use that term lightly, Iran continued to claim they had no interest in building nuclear weapons and that they had abandoned Project Amad back in 2003, but would now hold to a deal they lied to get into.

And to that affect Steffen Seibert, the German government spokesman said, “It is clear that the international community had doubts that Iran was carrying out an exclusively peaceful nuclear program. It was for this reason the nuclear accord was signed in 2015, including the implementation of an unprecedented, thorough and robust surveillance system by the International Atomic Energy Agency.”

Now we have two important questions for Mr. Seibert… first, if the IAEA surveillance system was as robust and thorough as you claim sir, why didn’t the IAEA discover the “half ton” of documentation directly related to Iran’s development of nuclear weapons…and second, if your country had doubts regarding Iran’s claims that they only sought a peaceful nuclear program, why is it that you now believe the only way to ensure that is to stick by a deal that was obviously negotiated in the worst of all bad faith?

Federica Mogherini, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy says that, “the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is responsible for verifying Iran’s compliance with the deal.” And pray tell Ms. Mogherini, with what exactly does the IAEA expect Iran to comply…the terms of the very deal they lied to get into or the actual lies they told to get into said deal?

And while the bulk of Europe’s leaders continue to defend said nuclear deal even after Netanyahu’s speech exposed Iran’s lies and their continued desire to build a nuclear arsenal, there remains a key component of said deal they all seem more than willing to ignore…that being the time-limited sunset clause baked right into the deal…the very clause where Iran in just a few years time can again crank up their nuclear program at will and produce as much enriched uranium as they want…and most importantly no longer having to hide what they’re doing.

Remember, the deal as it stands now expires in 2025, which then begs the obvious question that no one in the E.U. seems to want answered…if Iran did not intend to construct their own nuclear arsenal replete with short, medium, and long range ballistic missiles as their delivery system, why then did they try to hide the documentation of Project Amad instead of just turning over that very documentation to the IAEA to begin with?

To that affect, former Secretary of State John Kerry issued this statement the day after Prime Minister Netanyahu exposed Iran’s blatant lies, “Every detail PM Netanyahu presented yesterday was every reason the world came together to apply years of sanctions and negotiate the Iran nuclear agreement — because the threat was real and had to be stopped. It’s working!”

Working for whom Mr. Kerry? Obviously, it’s working out exactly the way both Iran and Kerry’s former boss, Barack HUSSEIN Obama, planned it. Iran has wanted nuclear weapons all along… never wavering from or even really trying to hide that desire…and both Obama and Kerry were and still are well aware of that fact. Iran blatantly tried to conceal their obviously ongoing nuclear research and development plans by not turning over all said documents to the IAEA, instead choosing to sit and wait for the “sunset” of the deal to bring that research and those development plans to fruition. And this means that Iran, despite their lies to the contrary, never abandoned Project Amad in 2003, in fact it’s very much alive today.

And yet another issue no one who continues to defend the nuclear deal wants to touch upon concerns the reach of Iran’s heavily touted long range ballistic missile program. This raises the question that if Iran had no intention of building nuclear weapons…weapons that would need to be delivered to its targets by ballistic missiles…why then has Iran continued to build and test such missiles…a direct violation of Annex B of resolution 2231?

So while former Secretary of State John Kerry and most of Europe’s leaders insist that Iran has not violated the nuclear deal, the fact remains that they don’t really have to because their ally North Korea has done the nuclear weapons development for them, while Iran in turn has been doing the must have delivery system development for North Korea.

Can Europe’s leaders be so ignorant as to not see what is more transparent than a pane of glass…can they not see that Iran and North Korea are working together to complete their respective nuclear arsenals under the very noses of the rest of the world and the IAEA…or is there something more than simple ignorance at play where Europe is concerned?

There is indeed more…much more.

Remember the ‘trump card’ we spoke about earlier…well as per President Trump, Iran is “behind every problem” in the Middle East…and guess what he’s right for never forget that Iran alone is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. And Iran uses that sponsorship…coupled with threats of more terrorism to come…as a way to keep Europe’s leaders towing their islamic line…towing their line even as fellow P5+1 members France, Britain, and Germany have said that they will stay committed to the agreement even if Trump decides to pull us out. And why…simply because the leaders of Europe think that a flawed deal is better than no deal at all.

“It is essential to maintain it [the agreement] to avoid proliferation. In this period when we see the risks with North Korea, we must maintain this line,” so said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian who remains ignorant to the fact that proliferation is happening now just as it has in the past and will in the future. This fact alone proves that for Europe proliferation is not the issue…economics is.

In other words follow the money for trade connections and existing investments are the true reason Europe is siding with Iran…that plus the release of Iranian oil…an import Europe desperately needs to help bring down its per barrel cost of oil.

And with Iranian exports to the E.U. increasing by a whopping 375% during the first year of the nuclear deal alone; and with European companies having already invested large sums of money in Iran itself; coupled with the reintroduction of banking connections between Iran and the West… even with the caveat of major European banks having to date refrained from directly dealing with Iranian government owned companies…European credit agencies have now stepped in to provide export guarantees to European companies willing to trade with Iran.

Simply, the European leaders truly but erroneously believe that with their renewed economic activity in Iran… as in the return to Iran of major European companies… and their buying of now released Iranian oil, that that in time will lead to a strengthening of Iranian civil society. But nothing could be farther from the truth as a civil society requires a civil government not a government entrenched in theocratic ideological leanings, meaning that for a civil society to return to Iran…for economic stability and growth to return as well…the mullah’s grip on Iranian society must be removed…something that must come from within Iran’s populace itself…a populace currently facing a 10.4 percent unemployment rate and 10.5 percent inflation.

But even knowing that Europe’s leaders fear that if Trump pulls us out of the Iranian nuclear deal then U.S. sanctions will again be put into place…extremely harsh sanctions that could affect business deals Europe already has in place with Iran. And to that affect, Europe’s leaders are worried that we could punish European companies, banks, and/or agencies that continue to deal with Iran. Now looking for ways to protect their investments one idea being touted is the idea of “protective legislation”…as in the E.U. itself blocking said sanctions.

However, the E.U. forgets that in realty sanctions really do not work for there is always ways to circumnavigate sanctions via countries not taking part in said sanctions. So, there is a truth that Europe must now face…do they stand by the U.S. if Trump does indeed pull us out of the Iranian nuclear deal or do they try to go around the sanctions by continuing to deal with Iran via lets say Russia or China.

In whatever way the E.U. decides to go either by their circumnavigating new sanctions or by offering multi-national companies that are engaged in trade with Iran some form of emergency credit to cover potential losses, there remains a very real possibility, one threatened by Iran itself, that Iran could, whether or not the U.S. gets out of the deal, leave the deal themselves.

According to Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, “The status quo of the deal is simply not sustainable for us, whether or not the Americans get out of the deal.” Add that to the facts that Iran has for months been stating that they might well abandon the nuclear deal over issues regarding Western banks ongoing refusals to do business with Tehran and Iran’s other threat to pull out of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty as well.

Obviously, Iran wants no part of the very bad deal not because the deal has stopped them from obtaining their own nuclear arsenal, but because it has slowed them down just a bit. Under the terms of the deal, should Iran actually abide by said terms, they would have to wait another seven years to do what they are now doing in secret, and Iran simply doesn’t want that sort of delay. But if there is any lingering doubt that Prime Minister Netanyahu, and for that matter President Trump, have been 100 percent correct regarding Iran and their clandestine nuclear weapons program all along consider the following.

While issuing threats to abandon the nuclear deal earlier this week, the head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, one Ali Akbar Salehi, was quoted as saying, “Iran is not bluffing…Technically, we are fully prepared to enrich uranium higher than we used to produce before the deal was reached…I hope Trump comes to his senses and stays in the deal.”

One simple fact remains ever present throughout all of the rhetoric, that being that in just seven years none of the rhetoric will matter as the deal will for the most part expire and Iran will be completely free to do as they will, so does it even matter whether President Trump ends our participation in that deal on May 12th?

No, it doesn’t, but that leads us to one final thought, one final possibility that most people have forgotten about.

Earlier this year, in mid-January, President Trump floated the idea of renegotiating the Iranian nuclear deal, an idea that in fact goes all the way back to mid-November of 2016. President Trump has been talking about a renegotiated deal since just days after his election and months before his inauguration, but what might such a renegotiated deal really look like?

Our guess is that such a newly formed deal would likely include banning all Iranian ballistic missile testing, a sharp reduction in the range of missiles Iran would be allowed to possess, a ban on any and all intervention by Iran or their proxies in any military action anywhere in the Middle East, and a substantial lengthening of the timeline of the current deal, perhaps by several decades.

In that way, a Trumpesque renegotiated deal would not be a great deal different than what French President Macron proposed last week in his meetings with President Trump, just a good deal stiffer and certainly with teeth built into it that the current deal sorely lacks.

It’s not a matter of whether or not Iran would ever agree to such a renegotiated deal or even whether or not Iran would agree to reopen negotiations…in fact they have announced that they will not renegotiate the deal…but we believe President Trump will still dangle such a proposal out there for the whole world to hear that would include the stipulation that unless Iran agreed the U.S. would have no choice but to walk away, thus putting the pressure and the responsibility for the deal’s collapse squarely on Iran’s shoulders and not on the shoulders of either the U.S. or Israel.

This, we believe, is the course President Trump will take and we have a very substantial reason for this belief…H.R. McMaster, who as National Security Advisor had been advising President Trump to stay in the deal is out and in his place we now have John Bolton who sees clearly the absurdity of the current deal, and has been no fan of it at all. And also out is Rex Tillerson, now the former Secretary of State under whom would have fallen the duty to renegotiate the deal, and Tillerson had made it clear he liked the current deal and believed we should stay in said deal. Replacing Tillerson is Mike Pompeo who like both Bolton and President Trump is fully cognizant regarding the truth of the current deal and knows that it is a recipe for sure disaster.

And so with Bolton and Pompeo now in Trump’s corner… a corner where Trump knows Iran will never renegotiate this deal…a strong case can be made regarding the fact that there is now overwhelming evidence…thanks to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu…that Iran not only negotiated the original deal in bad faith and with blatant lies, but with the U.N. also confirming that Iran has violated the terms of the original deal in regards to stockpiles of heavy water used for the production of plutonium, a key ingredient in nuclear weapons.

With the deadline for a decision looming, do not expect May 12, 2018 to be the end of the very bad Iranian nuclear deal, rather expect that date to be the beginning of the end for Iran as President Trump leads from the front and shows the rest of the world how the ‘art of the deal’ should have been handled in the first place.

Copyright @ 2018 Craig Andresen and Diane Sori / Right Side Patriots / All Rights Reserved.

************************************************************************

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS…LIVE!

Today, May 4th from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori present their special report; and important news of the day.

Hope you can tune in at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history

Corrupt Intentions…Dire Implications – Part 2 of 2

Earlier, in “Corrupt Intentions…Dire Implications – Part 1,” I outlined how FBI imp-1Director, James Comey, ignored a mountain of evidence that showed clear intent on the part of Hillary Clinton to break the laws of our land and how, whether or not she knew she was violating our laws, it should not have absolved her from prosecution.

I also stated that the implications of this ongoing situation were dire.

Let me jump right in and outline those implications and I’ll start where nobody else is going…with James Comey himself.

If, as some reports are stating, Comey and the FBI had all of Hillary’s emails well before last week’s announcement and reopening of the investigation into her illegal private server and illegal private email account…and by well before, it has been reported that Comey may well have had access to what is now being characterized as the new discovery of 650,000 emails on the computer belonging to Anthony Weiner and his estranged wife, Huma Abedin, before last July when Comey himself testified to Congress that he lacked evidence of “intent” on Hillary’s part and therefore declined to indict her…the implications are indeed dire.

If that is shown to be the case…

Continue reading

Corrupt Intentions…Dire Implications – Part 1 of 2

By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

di-1“I think she was extremely careless. I think she was negligent. That I could establish. What we can’t establish is that she acted with the necessary criminal intent.”

Those were the words of FBI Director, James Comey, last July, as he told Congress and the American people that he was not going to indict Hillary Clinton due to what he called a direct lack of evidence that showed “intent,” and I believe nobody was less surprised by that inaction than was Hillary Clinton herself.

On Tuesday…in yet another document dump by WikiLeaks…

Intent shown.

“On another matter….and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have to dump all those emails.”

Those were the words of Hillary’s campaign chairman, John Podesta, written in an email exchange with Hillary’s close aide, Cheryl Mills, just as news of Hillary’s private email account and private server…both illegal…was breaking in the NY times.

If, as Hillary has steadfastly claimed, the emails she erased or deleted…were nothing but her personal emails regarding yoga classes and Chelsea’s wedding…

Continue reading

Hillary, Under Oath, Became Her Own Worst Enemy

‘By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net

espi 1There was a line of questioning, last Thursday, during Hillary Clinton’s more than 11 hours of testimony before Trey Gowdy’s House Select Committee on Benghazi that went nearly unnoticed…nearly…but I noticed it and you may have as well but it bears highlighting.

It was back in very early August, August 5th I believe, that I wrote of Hillary’s violation of the Espionage Act of 1917 and I went into some detail regarding that violation…

“In that act, it clearly states that…“gross negligence” as per the handling of any information regarding our national defense is a punishable offense…a crime…and as such, should national defense information be removed from or not stored properly…not stored in its “proper place of custody,” the responsible government official would face a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment.”

“Hello Hillary Clinton.”

“While one certainly knows that in 1917, the “proper place of custody” was a file cabinet or a safe and that those who wrote and enacted the Act never in their wildest dreams considered the advent of email…government servers, not one’s private servers located in one’s home in Chappaqua N.Y. are the “proper places of custody” today and in that regard…Hillary Clinton and her use of private email addresses and said servers is in breach of the 1917 Act.”

A little later in that August 5th article, I wrote this…

Continue reading

Hillary…Emails, Lies, and Video Tape

By: Craig Andresen and Diane Sori / Right Side Patriots on CPR Worldwide Media / www.cprworldwidemedia,net

In room 1100 of the Longworth House Office Building in Washington D.C., Republican timo 2members of the House Select Committee on Benghazi questioned former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton while Democratic committee members apologized to her for her even having to be there.
Working to build a case that Hillary Clinton had indeed been derelict in her duty to secure the Benghazi mission not only in the months before the 2012 terrorist attacks that resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith, and ex-Navy Seals Glen Doherty and Tyronne Woods, but to build a case that it was Clinton’s very inactions and lies spewed in her attempt to cover-up the administration’s illegal gun running operation to the anything but ‘moderate’ Syrian rebels that directly led to their deaths. And Hillary saying at the start of the hearing that, “We need leadership at home to match our leadership abroad…We should resist denigrating the patriotism or loyalty with whom we disagree. So I am here.” is quite laughable as these were words from the very woman who said at the recent Democratic debate that “Republicans are the enemy.”

Continue reading

Hillary…Between Trey Gowdy and a Hard Spot

By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net

On ThursdBET 1ay of this week, October 22, 2015…Hillary Clinton will be between a rock and a hard spot. The Hard spot will of the truth while the rock will be Trey Gowdy.

While many are somewhat baffled by the seeming lack of progress of Gowdy’s House Select Committee on Benghazi, nothing could be further from the truth as, in fact, great progress has been made what’s lacking in it are the headlines but that is by design.

Trey Gowdy, at this point, doesn’t give a happy damn about the headlines because headlines are not what he’s after in all of this…the truth is his mission and in that pursuit, Trey Gowdy is like a hungry dog tracking down a pork chop.

Over the past several months, Gowdy and his committee have interviewed some 41 witnesses…that would be 41 witnesses no other investigative committee related to Benghazi has so much as said good morning to and of those 41 untouched by any investigation witnesses…7 of them were eye-witnesses to the attack in Benghazi on September 11th, 2012. They were there. They saw it happen, They survived it and they know exactly what transpired…not only that fateful night but in the days, weeks and months leading up to that fateful night.

Trey Gowdy and his committee have also looked at some 50,000 emails and documents no other investigative committee, related to Benghazi, has seen and those emails and documents, until Gowdy got his committee’s hands on them, had ever been provided to congress.

Oh, there’s more…

Continue reading

Hillary’s Dance of Desperation – Oct. 22nd Looms Large

By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net

gow 1Don’t you just LOVE the way that every news report regarding the Benghazi Committee these days begins with…”The REPUBLICAN led Benghazi Committee?”

There are, of course, two reasons for that approach but only one of which the mainstream media wants to mention…that being the fact that the committee IS led by REPUBLICANS. What the mainstream media does NOT want to admit is that the REASON the committee is Republican led…in fact, the reason ALL the committees are now led by Republicans is, due to Shellacking II, the sequel to the midterm 2010 shellacking…REPUBLICANS are now the majority in both the House AND the Senate.

Just a couple of days ago, the mainstream media tried to make a load of hay from a load of crap when their headlines read that somebody, a REPUBLICAN, who had been fired from the committee was claiming that the entire committee was POLITICAL and PARTISAN in nature.

This of course, played well amongst the liberal media as it is liberals, running terrified, who want to try and shut down the Benghazi Committee before October 22nd, that being the day when Hillary is scheduled to appear unless of course, she falls down and goes boom…again.

Well…

Continue reading

Hillary’s High Liar Act Without a Net

By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net

yoga 7Another day and yet another of Hillary’s email sandal lies has been exposed. Her campaign staff is surely removing all sharp objects from her reach and no doubt, they have also relieved her of her shoe strings.

Hillary’s favorable ratings are sinking fast…down to but 38% a 7 point drop since May, her favorable rating, among democrats, is now down 11 points since May and since May, Hillary’s support from women has now dropped below 50%.

I expect any day now the call to abandon ship will be issued because, as though Trey Gowdy needs any more ammunition, Hillary’s emails are the gift that keeps on giving.

On Saturday, it was revealed or leaked that once again, Hillary lied. Previously, she had stated that she had turned over all…ALL of her work-related emails to the Department of State. Not only did she state it…she signed a sworn statement under penalty of perjury to it.

I, Hillary Rodham Clinton, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:
1. While I do not know what information may be “responsive” for purposes of this law suit, I have directed that all my e-mails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or potentially were federal records to be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done.
2. As a result of my directive, approximately 55,000 pages of these emails were produced to the Department on December 5, 2014.
3. Cheryl Mills did not have an account on clintonemail.com. Huma Abedin did have such an account which was used at times for government business.

Hillary, adding to the growing list of offenses, has now committed perjury because, it has been discovered that an email chain, between her and General Petraeus, had NOT been handed over as ordered by a federal judge but that’s not the biggest news coming from this particular breech of the law.

The BIG news is…who handed over this latest string of emails…

Continue reading

Let’s Make a Deal…

By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net

lic 2Isn’t it nice to know, that with the world going to hell in a hand bag, ISIS marauding about, Iran getting a nuclear weapon, a liberal/socialist candidate mired in corruption, Putin rebuilding the old Russian empire, more people out of the workforce that ever before and on and on and on…that we have so many single issue voters out there on our side?

Forget all the stuff that is actually going to destroy us or kill us…

Carly Fiorina said that a county clerk in Kentucky should do her job or be fired.

I have seen a good number of those who profess to be Conservatives out there RAILING on Fiorina…”SO MUCH FOR BEING A CONSERVATIVE” they say…if she thinks some county clerk should be issuing marriage licenses…to GAY people…she’s just not fit to be a Conservative.

Here’s Fiorina’s quote…then I’ll tell you MY problem with it.

“First, I think that we must protect religious liberties with great passion and be willing to expend a lot of political capital to do so now because it’s clear religious liberty is under assault in many, many ways. Having said that, when you are a government employee, I think you take on a different role. When you are a government employee as opposed to say, an employee of another kind of organization, then in essence, you are agreeing to act as an arm of the government.”

“And, while I disagree with this court’s decision, their actions are clear. And so I think in this particular case. This woman now needs to make a decision that’s conscious — is she prepared to continue to work for the government, be paid for by the government in which case she needs to execute the government’s will, or does she feel so strongly about this that she wants to sever her employment with the government and go seek employment elsewhere where her religious liberties would be paramount over her duties as as government employee.”

So…

Continue reading