Tag Archives: treason

Benghazi – Lies, Damn lies and Treason

Posted on by

Well, well.

How do ya like THAT?

Tuesday, our Dictator held an impromptu presser and right off the bat he issues THIS simple and UNDENIABLE lie regarding the Benghazi survivors and their absence at congressional hearings.

“I’m not familiar with this notion that anybody has been blocked from testifying. So what I’ll do is I will find out what exactly you’re referring to.”

IT’S A BALD-FACED, UNADULTERATED LIE!!!!!

How do I know this?

Well. For the answer, I would refer you to my article on March 21st, more than a full month ago, entitled, “Benghazi Survivors – Where’s the Damn Movie?”

If you have forgotten that article, I suggest you click the link above and refresh your memory.

In that article I stated, “Earlier this week, DC Town Liar, Jay Carney told the assembled press that nobody in this administration was hushing the survivors of the Benghazi attacks.

His exact words were, “I’m sure that the White House is not preventing anyone from speaking.”

Now then…as the topic HAD, most CLEARLY, come up before and, as Jay Carney had most CLEARLY addressed it…

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Benghazi Survivors – Where’s the Damn Movie?

Posted on by

“The only people that don’t want to disclose the truth, are people with something to hide.”

Earlier this week, DC Town Liar, Jay Carney told the assembled press that nobody in this administration was hushing the survivors of the Benghazi attacks.

His exact words were, “I’m sure that the White House is not preventing anyone from speaking.”

BULLCRAP!!!

According to Sen. Lindsey Graham, “I’ve had contact with some of the survivors. Their story is chilling. The bottom line is, they feel that they cannot come forward. They’ve been told to be quiet. And at the end of the day, we can’t let this administration or any other administration get away with hiding from the American people and the Congress people who were there in real-time to tell the story.”

The idea that some 3 dozen people made it out of that situation alive and have not uttered a single peep about what happened on September 11th 2012 is very telling.

Not one has gone to the press. Not one has told a Member of congress that they are willing to testify.

Not one.

Their names are unknown.

Their whereabouts are unknown.

And their reasons for their silence can be guessed.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Weekend Edition: Benghazi – 5 Months Of Treason

Posted on by

“I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure we are securing our personnel and that we are doing whatever we need to. Number two, we are going to investigate exactly what happened and make sure it doesn’t happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice.”

Those are the words of Obama regarding his orders on the evening of September 11th 2012 and the attack on the Consulate in Benghazi.

“Make sure we are securing our personnel and that we are doing whatever we need to.”

This is a claim Obama has made over and over again.

Now…let me take you to the direct testimony, under oath, of Leon Panetta and General Dempsey just a couple of days ago.

SEN. GRAHAM: Your testimony, as I understand it, Secretary Panetta, that you talked to the president of the United States one time.
SEC. PANETTA: I talked to him on Sept. 11 with regards to the fact that we were aware this attack was taking place.
SEN. GRAHAM: One time.
SEC. PANETTA: Right.
SEN. GRAHAM: What time did you tell him that?
SEC. PANETTA: I think that was approximately about 5 o’clock?
GEN. DEMPSEY: Yeah, about 5 o’clock.
SEC. PANETTA: About 5 o’clock.
SEN. GRAHAM: General Dempsey, did you ever talk to the president of the United States at all?
GEN. DEMPSEY: I was with the secretary when — at that same time.
SEN. GRAHAM: Did you talk to the president?
GEN. DEMPSEY: Yes.
SEN. GRAHAM: You talked to him how many times.
GEN. DEMPSEY: The same — one time.
SEN. GRAHAM: How long did the conversation last?
GEN. DEMPSEY: We were there in the office for probably 30 minutes.
SEN. GRAHAM: So you talked to him for 30 minutes, one time, and you never talked to him again, either one of you.
GEN. DEMPSEY: Until afterwards.
SEN. GRAHAM: Until after the attack was over.
GEN. DEMPSEY: That’s right.
SEN. GRAHAM: Thank you.

Let that sink in. Read it again if you need to and let it sink in deep.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Hillary’s 2016 Campaign Off and Running

Posted on by

The amount of crap forced down the one and only toilet at an All You Can Eat Burrito Buffet PALES in comparison to the TURD FEST that spewed forth from Hillary’s testimony before the senate and the house yesterday.

Clearly, in yesterday’s senate and house hearings, there were two objectives.

Socialists on the committees were there to build Hillary’s street cred for a 2016 run at the palace.

Conservatives on the committees were there to get answers as to what happened in Benghazi.

It was, to be sure…Orwellian.

In what could ONLY be described as a BALD FACED ATTEMPT to divert the topic and aid in the cover-up of the Benghazi attack…Dick Durbin ACTUALLY SUGGESTED A HEARING ON WMD IN IRAQ!!!!

Tom Udall took the time to thank Hillary for handing out COOK STOVES to those in impoverished countries.

COOK STOVES???

Really?

In fact, the amount of praise heaped upon Hillary between the two hearings was enough to make a maggot barf.

It was also clear there was a great deal of collusion between Hillary and the socialist Members of both committees.

Those with a (D) after their names, regardless of senate or house Members, asked the same questions dealing with almost anything BUT Benghazi and Hillary’s answers to those questions were the same, nearly word for word to the house committee as they were in the senate hours before.

I would be absolutely SHOCKED if Hillary didn’t write those questions herself and distribute them to (D) questioners ahead of time so that the questions would then correspond with her pre-written and well rehearsed answers.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Remember the Benghazi 4???

Posted on by

It’s been 4 months since the attacks in Benghazi.

4 months.

How’s the search for the real killers coming?

Well…The only TERRORIST held in connection with the attack has been released from a jail in Tunisia due to a lack of evidence and, one can only surmise that the same lack of evidence is also responsible for keeping the only FILMMAKER who had nothing whatsoever to do with it locked up on federal charges not at all related TO the attack in Benghazi.

Obama, who has, time and time again, vowed to bring those responsible to justice apparently was unable to find a culprit in the golf courses of Hawaii during his recent $6 million dollar vacation which may well be due to the absence of strawberry frappes on sidewalk café menus there.

Meanwhile…

Ambassador Stevens, Glen Doherty, Sean Smith and Tyrone Woods are still dead.

Hillary Clinton who, reportedly knew a whole lot about what happened and what didn’t has, again, agreed to testify so long as a stomach virus, concussion, blood clot or wine tasting doesn’t interfere with the timing.

Shall we start a pool on the number of times she won’t be able to recall details?

There ARE survivors of the attacks. Those whom Tyrone Woods defied orders to save from the Consulate and those who managed to survive the attack on the CIA safe house.

Where in the HELL are they?

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Haul Hillary In on a Gurney DAMNIT!!!

Posted on by

First…

She didn’t want to testify until her own “internal investigation” was complete.

Hillary wanted her own people to come up with their own facts regarding Benghazi.

“Let us complete our investigation” we were all told. Then, she said, she would have the facts.

Okay…

Next…She couldn’t testify before a congressional committee because she had…Prior plans.

A wine tasting in Australia.

Oh…But she WILL testify we were all told. They were in the process of completing their “internal investigation.”

After that, Hillary contracted a “stomach virus” which kept her at home.

Hmmmm….

Then, finally…The “internal investigation” we were all waiting for was finished but, what’s this?

Hillary fell down.

She gave herself a concussion.

She couldn’t testify because she had a concussion but…Don’t worry…She WILL testify we were all told. She will…Just as soon as she’s better.

Now…

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Nobody Died From the Use of White Out

Posted on by

Good grief.

Now Congress is going to hold hearings, being people in and question them regarding talking points.

Congress?

WRONGRESS!!!

Rather than try and find out who changed the talking points that went from Petraeus to who-knows-who and back to Petraeus where, apparently he didn’t recognize his own memo…

How about we try to learn what actually LED to the need for those talking points to begin with before we delve into “Who put the bomp In the bomp bah bomp bah bomp???”

Instead of going full on to discover who used white out and removed “Terrorists” to be replaced with “”grumpy film critics” why aren’t we going balls to the walls to find out the following???

Why were all the requests for added security in Benghazi denied and who exactly denied those requests?

Why was security DOWNSIZED in Benghazi and who made THAT call???

Why, after 234 terrorist attacks in Libya over 16 months, 48 in Benghazi, 2 on our Consulate, 2 attempts on the life of the British Ambassador and both the British and the Red Cross pulling OUT of Benghazi was it deemed unnecessary, despite the repeated pleas for more security even by Ambassador Stevens himself, to ramp up security as the anniversary of 9-11 approached???

Who exactly was watching in real time, on 9-11-12, in the State Dept. and in the White House and possible in the Pentagon as the attacks took place???

WHO ISSUED THE ORDERS TO STAND DOWN???

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Hello??? Benghazi? Treason?? FOCUS!!!

Posted on by

During WWII, WE called it “Chaff”…The Brits called it “Window” and the German Luftwaffe referred to it as “Duppel.”

What was it?

It was pieces of aluminum dropped from aircraft to confuse radar.

Today’s military uses flares to confuse missiles fired at our aircraft and ECM to confuse radar.

It all adds up to one thing.

Shiny objects.

Shiny objects are distractions and meant to keep our eyes OFF the real story and this administration wants us to chase the shiny objects.

The REAL story is Benghazi.

David Petraeus…Shiny object.

Paula Broadwell…Shinier object.

The You Tube video…Former shiny object now dull

The election…Shiny object.

Hurricane Sandy…Shiny object.

Now we have NEW shiny objects…

General John Allen and Jill Kelley!!!

Jill Kelley is some sort of government social liaison who knows the Petraeus family and had something to do with alerting the FBI to the relationship between David Petraeus and Paula Broadwell.

NOW we learn that there are between 20,000 and 30,000 “inappropriate” emails floating out there between…

Jill Kelley and…General John Allen who leads our military in Afghanistan!!!

It’s sexy.

It’s salacious.

It’s intriguing.

It involves espionage, the head of the CIA, an FBI investigation, suppressed knowledge of those at the highest levels of government including Holder and Obama, a link to a General in command of forces at war…emails…careers…

Ummmm…The REAL story…

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Weekend Edition: Petraeus – A 4 Star Scapegoat

Posted on by

General David Petraeus, head of the CIA, resigned last week.

His resignation was sudden and it was…

Convenient.

Just days AFTER the election and just days BEFORE he was scheduled to testify before congress regarding the terrorist attack in Benghazi…General David Petraeus resigns.

Why?

Because of an extramarital affair? An affair uncovered by the FBI due to emails sent between Petraeus and his biographer with whom he was involved?

Those emails were sent, back and forth from Petraeus to Paula Broadwell, the “other” woman on his personal Gmail account. NOT his official CIA email which would lead one to believe that anyone attempting to hack his email would have ended up seeing ONLY personal messages and NOTHING to do with the closely held secrets the head of the CIA would be privy to.

Naturally, an affair opens someone such as Petraeus to blackmail but, that’s ONLY if someone such as Petraeus wants to keep the affair a deep dark secret and is willing to do ANYTHING to maintain that secrecy.

Petraeus, obviously, was NOT about to do that. In fact, by revealing the affair and “walking” away from his distinguished career, he proves he’s not willing to protect his private life over the security of the nation or the people he directs.

It seems that the FBI investigation uncovered this affair MONTHS ago. And if there was some concern over his ability to keep state secrets this all would have come to an end…MONTHS ago.

Also, by law, if the FBI comes to the knowledge of something that rises to the level of a threat to national security, they must inform the white house and the Senate Intelligence Committee immediately.

They did NOT.

Supposedly, James Clapper, the National Intelligence Director didn’t know anything about this until election day. Obama supposedly didn’t know about it until election day and…Diane Feinstein, head of the Senate Intell Committee didn’t find out until it hit the press last week!!!

So…Why NOW?

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Weekend Edition: IT WAS TREASON – Arrest Obama

Posted on by

Last Thursday, I wrote an article titled, “Obama & Libya – A Case Study in Treason” and in that article I stated, “When a president fails to lift a finger to protect Americans, at home or abroad, in the face of overwhelming intelligence and evidence, by ignoring obvious warning signs and the advice of those entrusted to offer such protection…”

“It is treason.”

I meant every word and yes, I am well aware of the weight of the word, “treason.”

I do not nor have I ever used it lightly. I see that word bandied about on social media and while I understand full well the passion of those who use it, I rarely, if ever, believe that the issues to which it is applied, truly rise to that level.

This situation, in Libya, I am convinced…Does.

To explain, let’s first look at the legal definition and it’s context within our Constitution.

Definition of Treason in the Constitution:

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”

Legal Definition of Treason:

The betrayal of one’s own country by waging war against it or by consciously or purposely acting to aid its enemies.

Under Article III, Section 3, of the Constitution:

Any person who levies war against the United States or adheres to its enemies by giving them Aid and Comfort has committed treason within the meaning of the Constitution. The term aid and comfort refers to any act that manifests a betrayal of allegiance to the United States, such as furnishing enemies with arms, troops, transportation, shelter, or classified information. If a subversive act has any tendency to weaken the power of the United States to attack or resist its enemies, aid and comfort has been given.

Day by day…Nearly hour by hour, we learn more about what transpired in Benghazi on 9-11-12.

Yesterday, we learned a truly horrific truth.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share