This Article is Co-Written by Diane Sori
And so Barack HUSSEIN Obama went against NOT only long-standing U.S. policy NEVER to negotiate with terrorists but as Craig explained in Part 2 of our expose, Obama circumnavigated set law and Congress to do so. Now defending his decision to have secret and indirect negotiations
with the Taliban, and hoping that the Bergdahl deal would set an example for cooperation between the Taliban and the secular government, Obama unilaterally decided that the five now released terrorists were well-worth the trade for Bowe Bergdahl, and did so by using the excuse that the deal was part of America’s “iron-clad commitment to bringing our prisoners home.”
An ‘ironclad commitment’ that Obama ignored for five long years until he needed it for his own political expediency…as in to divert attention off the ever expanding Benghazi and VA scandals and investigations.
Also saying that “The Qatari government has given us assurances that it will put in place measures to protect our national security” what we want to know is who does Obama think he is to leave the protecting of our national security to a foreign government…even a foreign government that acted as the go-between in the Bergdahl release…especially a foreign government that has NOT always been friendly to the U.S.
When it comes to Benghazi…The more dots we are given to connect, the sharper the treasonous picture becomes and now, thanks to the Senate Intelligence Committee Report, we have even MORE dots on the page.