Tag Archives: TERRORISTS

Senate Report on Benghazi – SOFT-SELLING TREASON

Posted on by

Yesterday, an 85 page “report” said to be “comprehensive” was released by the Senate “Intelligence” Committee regarding the September 11th, 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi.

I am livid.

Not only is this report far from “comprehensive,” I submit it lacks intelligence and moreover, comments made regarding it by the lead Republican on that committee show a mind-numbing lack of desire to truly get to the bottom of the attacks and hold those truly responsible to account.

Saxby Chambliss, the ranking Republican on that senate committee said of the report that it provides, “needed and deserved answers.”

BULLCRAP senator…BULLCRAP.

It answers nothing as those responsible FOR those terrorist attacks have yet to answer for ANY of their actions.

I’ll get back to that…TRUST ME!!!

Secondly…

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Weekend Edition: NY Times – Covering (UP) Benghazi – Pt.2

Posted on by

In yesterday’s Weekend Edition, I outlined the desperation of last week’s New York Times attempt to provide cover by reintroducing that lame and false You Tube fabrication for the Benghazi attacks.

I also kicked down the door as to who would have HAD to be involved, why and to what ends.

I went so far as to expose the preemptive nature behind the cover story AND the actions of 8 Democrats in the house.

If you missed it…Have a look at the truly disgusting nature of those who would conspire, collude, commit and cover up acts of TREASON.

But, I said there was more and, there is.

To truly delve into the desperate nature of liberals, Obama, his administration, Hillary and the New York Times…One must fully realize how far the Times is willing to go and why.

Last week, The NY Times released an editorial regarding Benghazi and that You Tube video ass covering story stating: “Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.”

The Times didn’t stop there.

Oh…SOMEBODY is TRULY desperate…

Last Thursday, they actually made a claim SO outrageous, SO absurd, that it defies common sense and DEFINES desperation.

As their latest effort at providing some sort of “reasonable” doubt for any upcoming trial of either Hillary, Obama or BOTH was falling apart due to REAL FACTS garnered from SWORN TESTIMONY provided by CIA BENGHAZI SURVIVORS behind the closed doors of the house oversight committee…

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Weekend Edition: NY Times – Covering (UP) Benghazi – Pt.1

Posted on by

Last week, the New York Times garnered publicity by trying to claim that the 9-11-2012 attacks in Benghazi really WERE because of an obtuse, low budget, You Tube video that, essentially, nobody saw.

The fallout was decisive from their inopportune editorial.

Members of congress from both parties quickly derided the opinion piece as bunk, citing evidence gathered via sources under oath from house and senate hearings that pointed directly toward al Qaeda and their affiliate, Ansar al Sharia…al Qaeda by another name.

Many called the NYT piece what it was.

Cover for Hillary’s 2016 ambitions but…

I contend there is more to it than that.

Much more to it than that.

Before I delve into what that much more is, we need to take a quick look at the claims made in the Times.

First…

Here is the direct quote from David D. Kirkpatrick of the Times in that piece:

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Benghazi: Witnesses to Treason Set to Testify

Posted on by

To be completely candid, there aren’t very many Members of Congress that I, or anyone for that matter, trust but, Trey Gowdy is one of the handful I would trust 24/7 365.

Gowdy is an exceptional representative to his constituents and were all congressmen and women the caliber of Trey Gowdy, this nation would be in fine shape.

According to Gowdy, the Obama administration has been changing the names…Providing aliases, to the survivors of Benghazi.

Gowdy would not make such a claim were there no evidence to back it up.

Gowdy recently told The Blaze: “Stop and think what things are most calculated to get at the truth? Talk to people with first-hand knowledge. What creates the appearance and perhaps the reality of a cover-up? Not letting us talk with people who have the most amount of information, dispersing them around the country and changing their names.”

Indeed, Trey Gowdy has questions, lots of them, for the long hidden away Benghazi survivors but, he has a few rather common sense questions for the media as well.

“Does it bother you whether or not you know why Chris Stevens was in Benghazi?”

“Do you know why we were the last flag flying in Benghazi after the British had left and the Red Cross had been bombed? Do you know why requests for additional security were denied?”

Those survivors, most of them CIA agents who were on the ground IN Benghazi nearly 15 months ago have reportedly been threatened by the Obama administration including the CIA, the Justice Department and the State Department.

According to white house court jester, Jay Carney:

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Unable to Defend Their Agenda, Liberals Attack the T.E.A. Party

Posted on by

The die has been cast for the 2014 midterm elections as well as for the 2016 general elections and liberals know that the overriding issues for either election are not in their favor.

This is why we have seen ramped up efforts on the part of liberals to demonize the Tea Party.

Make no mistake, these are preemptive strikes.

During the 2010 midterms, liberals took the Tea Party far, far too lightly and the result was a major shellacking. Liberals lost the house and with it, the smooth waters for Obama’s socialist agenda.

Now, Obama’s party is running scared, sensing a sequel to those 2010 midterms.

Historically, midterm elections do not favor the party in power and liberals know that all too well.

To combat the coming storm, liberals are now increasing their efforts to label Conservatives as the party of evil, vile and destructive agenda motives.

Arsonists…Hostage takers…Terrorists…purveyors of domestic violence…Demanding ransoms…Extremists…Racist…

You have heard the labels and they will only become more vile as we approach the 2014 elections with the Tea Party square in the crosshairs.

The liberal core voters are uninformed, will vote democrat, as they have for decades, even in the face of their own reality, and they are gullible, believing whatever they are told by their party regardless of the truth.

The truth of the Tea Party is exactly the opposite of the liberal propaganda.

The Tea Party.

The…

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Obama Is Giving Your 2nd Amendment Rights to Terrorists

Posted on by

Let’s have a look at the pattern of behavior regarding our 2nd Amendment presented by the Obama administration for a moment.

We know these things are happening, that they are consistent and that the list of them continues to grow but, sometimes, until we see it in writing, the overall danger of the pattern is dismissed.

It shouldn’t be.

To fully understand the Obama concept of our 2nd Amendment, one needs to go back to the beginning.

In this case, the beginning is when Obama was a “professor” at the university of Chicago teaching, of all things, Constitutional Law to young and impressionable, government school indoctrinated youth.

That is where economist, then a professor himself and now author, John R. Lott Jr. met Barack Hussein Obama.

In his book, “At the Brink” in the 3rd chapter, Lott tells of when he and Obama had a discussion regarding guns and the 2nd Amendment.

What, according to Lott, Obama said was stunning and important to his current stance on guns.

Said Obama…

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Obama – You Don’t Have the Right to Lecture US on Moral Obligations

Posted on by

How’s that again?

Seriously…Did Obama REALLY say that???

“I think we have both a moral obligation and a national security interest in both a) ending the slaughter in Syria and b) ensuring a stable Syria.”

Yes.

That is exactly what he said.

So…NOW he wants to talk about “MORAL OBLIGATIONS???”

Okay…

Let’s talk about “MORAL OBLIGATIONS.”

HILLARY CLINTON had a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to ensure that our diplomats were protected in Libya.

Under HER “leadership,” no doubt guided by her “MORAL OBLIGATIONS,” our security personnel in Libya, specifically Benghazi, were drawn DOWN.

Under her “MORAL OBLIGATION” to ensure their safety…

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Weekend Edition: Dear Nobel Peace Prize Committee

Posted on by

Dear Nobel Peace Prize Committee,

It is well past the time for you to admit you made a mistake.

On October 9th, 2009, you gave one of your “PEACE” prizes to one Barack Hussein Obama and cited…

Obama’s “promotion of nuclear nonproliferation” and a “new climate” in international relations fostered by Obama, especially in reaching out to the Muslim world,” In doing so.

Even an organization as suspect as yours must now accept that this was a large crock of crap.

Outside of the despots in Iran and North Korea, who ISN’T for nuclear nonproliferation?

Seriously…WHO???

If that was a valid reason for giving someone a medal you would be turning those things out like Hershey’s cranks out Kisses.

And this…”OUTREACH TO THE MUSLIM WORLD” might be one of the most LUDACRIS things ever imagined.

Have you dunderheads noticed what’s going ON in that world???

The MUSLIMS dislike us more NOW than they did when you put Obama on a pedestal.

THEY HATE US.

Not only that but…Just look at the things your “PEACE” prize winner has been doing.

For instance…

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Weekend Edition: Syria – Operation: Because Everybody’s Laughing

Posted on by

There has been a number of inane comments made by the Obama administration regarding the desire to launch an attack on Syria but, perhaps the most brainless to date was uttered by Nancy Pelosi.

Here is exactly what she said on Thursday night.

“Assad gassing his own people is an issue of our national security, regional stability and global security. We must be clear that the United States rejects the use of chemical weapons by Assad or any other regime.”

The woman is beyond even professional help.

First of all…Do we even know that ASSAD ordered the gassing?

No.

Do we know that ONLY Assad’s army is responsible for the gassing?

No.

Given that, there are even MORE pressing questions needing to be addressed when it comes to this absurd statement from Pelosi.

First…

How, exactly, is the gassing of anyone, half a world away and limited to the borders of Syria a THREAT TO…OUR…NATIONAL SECURITY???

We have an unsealed border to our south and we know full well that Hezbollah has their operatives on the Mexican side of the border.

THAT is a NATIONAL SECURITY matter.

Obama gave THOUSANDS of weapons to MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS.

THAT is a National Security matter.

The Obama administration if rife with members of THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD.

THAT is a NATIONAL SECURITY MATTER.

The list of REAL matters of NATIONAL SECURITY, ignored and coddled by this absurd administration is LONG and DANGEROUS but…

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

DICTATORS Don’t NEED the CONSENT OF CONGRESS

Posted on by

In a not at all surprising move yesterday, Russia and China, both vitriolic supporters of Assad, got up and walked OUT of a U.N. Security Council meeting regarding Syria and the impending military strike Obama is desperate to make.

They WALKED OUT.

Their position is clear and that’s not good news for the U.N. puppet, Obama.

He will NOT have the authorization of his beloved union of despots, thugs and thieves to launch attacks on Syria but…Will he have the authorization of his own CONGRESS?

Ahhhhh…That is the question.

Obama and HIS regime say that the impending strikes are not about regime change in SYRIA.

NOT ABOUT REGIME CHANGE IN SYRIA.

He HAS to make that claim, for doing otherwise, would be announcing his transparent support of al Qaeda and other terrorist entities in yet another sovereign nation.

He did it in Libya and covered it up.

He did it in Egypt and cloaked it in a “democratic election.”

He did it in Iraq and Afghanistan by announcing our retreat.

He did it in Iran by NOT interfering when pro-democracy protesters were massacred there.

Now, by aiding and trying to supply al Qaeda, Ansar al-Sharia and other such ilk in Syria, he intends to assist those terrorist groups by striking Syria with Tomahawk cruise missiles.

Obama wants to attack…

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share