Yesterday’s article in The National Patriot, The REAL Obama: An INDONESIAN, Muslim, Socialist Puppet, seems to have lit a fire.
The overwhelming resemblance between Obama and Mohammad Subud, the Indonesian, former Muslim and founder of the Subud cult is undeniable but that, predictably, didn’t deter liberals from collectively gnashing their teeth.
Conservatives, on the other hand, respectfully questioned the subtle differences between the 2 men with the difference in hair texture and skin tone being their primary points of discussion.
I would like to address those differences here.
First, the hair.
There is no doubt that Obama has hair most often associated with black or African ancestry while Subud’s hair was that of the Asian or Indonesian persuasion.
To explain the difference, one must look into both men’s backgrounds.
Simply put, we have very few points of reference regarding Subud’s ancestry. No information regarding his parents, grandparents and no photos to use as comparisons.
His genetic makeup is something of a mystery but, I’ll get back to this shortly.
Obama, on the other hand, is a different story.
Over the last several days, conservatives across social media have been circulating an image, a split screen cut and paste of Obama and Mohammed (Pak) Subud along with a link to a very well thought out piece from 
Yet another week of obtuse liberal/socialist insanity is in the books and history will not treat it kindly.
When it comes to Benghazi…The more dots we are given to connect, the sharper the treasonous picture becomes and now, thanks to the Senate Intelligence Committee Report, we have even MORE dots on the page.
Yesterday, an 85 page “report” said to be “comprehensive” was released by the Senate “Intelligence” Committee regarding the September 11th, 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi.
In yesterday’s Weekend Edition, I outlined the desperation of last week’s New York Times attempt to provide cover by reintroducing that lame and false You Tube fabrication for the Benghazi attacks.