Category Archives: Election 2012

URGENT BREAKING…OBAMA ELIGIBILITY RULING IN GEORGIA

Posted on by

URGENT BREAKING NEWS!!!

On Thursday, Feb. 2nd 2012, exactly 1 week after the court hearing in Georgia regarding Obama’s eligibility to appear on that state’s ballot for the 2012 elections, and after neither Obama nor his attorney participated in that hearing, a motion was filed by the Liberty Legal Foundation.

“…that the Superior Court find the Defendant in willful contempt of Court, and that the Superior Court impose sanctions commensurate with an act that threatens the foundations of our Constitutional Republic.”

There have over the course of our nation’s history, been several times when a President has been subpoenaed and until last week, each of those Presidents has complied with the court’s orders.

Last week, Obama and his attorney sent a clear message that Obama was above the law and need not answer to the judicial branch.

Indeed, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, sent a letter to the Georgia Secretary of State a day ahead of the hearing stating neither he nor his client would take part in the hearing. Sec. of State Kemp then warned Jablonski that the choice was his but such a course of inaction would be at Jablonski’s, and his client’s, Obama’s peril.

WE NOW HAVE A RULING FROM THE JUDGE, THE HON. MICHAEL MALIHI…

IT HAS BEEN FOUND THAT OBAMA WILL …WE REPEAT… WILL…BE ALLOWED ON THE GEORGIA BALLOT!!!!!

 

As evidence and testimony was presented last Thursday, January 26th, in a Georgia courtroom regarding Obama’s past, his birth certificate, his Social Security number, his citizenship, his having lived in two different countries at the same time and more, the centerpiece of the hearing was his status as a Natural Born Citizen.

The Constitution clearly states one must BE a Natural Born Citizen to serve as President.

The plaintiffs and their legal teams, presented a strong case against Obama’s status as such. That part of the hearing revolved around the known fact that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen and an 1875 Supreme Court opining stating that a Natural Born Citizen would need parents…PLURAL…to qualify.

That case opinion from Minor vs Happersett, has been the lynchpin of this argument.

With NO evidence or testimony whatsoever was presented in Obama’s defense, Judge Mahili HAS found Obama ELIGIBLE for the Georgia ballot!!

While we expect this ruling to be appealed…for now…Obama IS on the ballot!!

As 6 other states are now considering such action in their courts, it is unknown how this ruling will effect those cases.

FOR FULL ANALYSIS OF THE RULING, PLEASE CLICK HERE!!


 

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Trump Endorses Romney…Who Benefits?

Posted on by

BREAKING NEWS!!!

Today, in Las Vegas, Donald Trump WILL endorse Mitt Romney. Even through early morning, it was thought the endorsement would go to Gingrich but, it has now been confirmed…it’s Romney.

How much weight does a Trump endorsement carry?

Maybe not as much as one would think.

While Trump draws a crowd wherever he goes and hitting the campaign trail for Mitt would be a draw, outside that, little if any effect is likely to be seen.

Yes, Trump adds bankroll but there is another effect that may work against Romney regarding the Trump endorsement.

Adding Donald Trump to the list of Romney endorsements is simply adding yet another moderate.

Bob Dole, John McCain, Jon Huntsman, Chris Christie…all endorsing Mitt Romney, none looked at by core conservatives and solid conservatives.

Trump in fact, recently changed his voter registration from Republican to undeclared and has for months, even after bailing out of the race, hinted at a possible independent run for the White House.

Doesn’t sound much like a dyed-in-the-wool conservative, does it?

One thing made clear by the upcoming endorsement today is that Trump will not be making that independent run after all.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Media Silence on Obama Eligibility Raises Questions

Posted on by

Since my article regarding the blow-by-blow account of the Georgia hearing on Obama’s eligibility to appear on that state’s ballot, one question has surfaced more than any other. This is a question which has been posed to me via social media, email and within the nearly 600 comments on that article.

The question is a simple one and a valid one.

Why has there been no media coverage of this?

Clearly, it’s a story.

A sitting President gets subpoenaed. Story.

A sitting President’s ability to be on a state’s ballot at risk. Story.

A sitting president’s attempt to dismiss the case denied. Story.

A sitting president ignores the subpoena. Story.

A sitting President’s attorney sends letter to Georgia Sec. of State saying he won’t participate. Story.

Sec. of State says don’t participate at your own risk. Story.

Hearing takes place, witnesses testify and evidence is presented with no refute from Sitting President’s attorney. Story.

NO MEDIA COVERAGE??? Story.

First, let’s have a look at the media.

The alphabet networks, also known as the mainstream or elite media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC etc. are all in the can for Obama or in his pocket. We all know that.

Why would they all of a sudden cover a story so potentially harmful to the guy who sends shivers up their collective legs?

This is the media arm of the Obama administration after all. These are the very people who refused to vet candidate Obama and anointed him their supreme leader. They went all in. They shielded Obama during the campaign, they have provided cover during his 3 years in office, they’ve been outwardly dismissive of any mention of his eligibility, they’ve labeled any who question it as nuts, mobs, terrorists, and worse.

At this point, when it actually gains a hearing before a judge and neither Obama nor his attorney show up even under subpoena, why would they now lend credibility to it?

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Obama’s Eligibility, A Constitutional Crisis in the Making

Posted on by

How exactly does one go about constructing a Constitutional crisis?

It can’t be done easily and it takes a concerted effort to contradict the very framework of our nation.

Obama is in the midst of such a creation.

If Georgia Judge, the Hon. Michael Malihi, returns a verdict disallowing Obama’s name from the Georgia ballot, a Constitutional crisis could well be the outcome. The threat of such an event can be no reason to issue a ruling which would avoid it.

In last week’s Georgia hearing, neither Obama nor his attorney were present. Obama was campaigning in Nevada and his attorney, Michael Jablonski, issued to the Georgia Sec. of State the previous day, his intention of non participation.

Regardless of the outcome and the decision of the Judge, an appeal will certainly follow and should the Judge rule against Obama, expect an injunction to be filed preventing the Georgia Sec. of State from taking action to remove Obama from the ballot.

One of the things which is sure to be brought into play by Jablonski is Executive Privilege.

It will be claimed that Obama, as sitting President, has the Executive Privilege to ignore the subpoena of the court.

We believe this will be met with resistance by the legal team for the plaintiffs.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Its Time for ALL of Us to Take Action on Obama’s Eligibility

Posted on by

Carter Braxton, Thomas Malaren, John Hart, David Farrar, Thomas Lynch Jr., Leah Lax, George Read, Laurie Roth, Lewis Morris, David Weldon, Stephen Hopkins, Carl Swensson, William Ellery and Kevin Richard Powell.

Who are they?

In a word…Patriots.

Braxton, Hart, Lynch Jr., Read, Morris, Hopkins and Ellery were among the 56 who signed their names to the Declaration of Independence.

The others, Malaren, Farrar, Lax, Roth, Weldon, Swensson and Powell…Patriots too.

The latter group were the plaintiffs, last Thursday in a courtroom in Atlanta, Georgia, as Obama’s eligibility to appear on that state’s ballot was held.

Were the 56 a great deal different than the 7?

No.

The 56 gave birth to a nation of laws and stated their case in the Declaration. That nation was, via the Constitution, entrusted to the people.

The 7, guided by the Constitution, are carrying the torch having stated their case in a Georgia courtroom.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Obama Eligibility and the Gotcha Liberals

Posted on by

It’s time I suppose to deal with some of the neener neener liberals out there. I know a few and a suspect you do too.

Liberals won’t do their homework or, they’ll only do it up to a point. They will parse out only what backs their position without bothering to mention the whole story.

You and I both know this kind of liberal, don’t we?

These are the Obama Kool Aid drinkers who just can’t bring themselves to the understanding that THEIR guy may well be in trouble and in order to deflect any talk of ineligibility, they try the old and worn…”Well, what about THESE Presidents…HUH?”…tact.

These liberals will lay upon you the names of other Presidents who had one or both parents born off soil so to speak so, let’s have a look shall we?

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

FULL ANALYSIS OF OBAMA ELIGIBILITY HEARING

Posted on by

For the first time, this morning in Georgia, the question of Obama’s eligibility to serve, became official. No longer the stuff of speculation, no longer dismissible by liberals as something which will never be heard in court, Obama’s eligibility became a matter of an official court record.

What does it mean?

To answer that, one must look at the reason for the hearing to begin with.

For years, Orly Taitz and the Liberty Legal Foundation along with others, have questioned Obama’s legal right to serve. For years, that argument centered on the birth certificate and whether or not Obama was born in the United States.

What made this case and this hearing different, is that it mattered not where Obama was born rather, at the center of the stage, would be the nationality of Obama’s father.

Obama’s father was never a U.S. Citizen and a great deal of evidence to that point was entered  into the official record this morning.

Another linchpin in all of this, is the definition of “Natural Born Citizen” which one must be, by writ of the Constitution, to hold the office of President. According to the plaintiffs in this hearing, that definition can be clearly found in the written opinion of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Minor vs Happersett from 1875.

That opinion, which by the way is backed up by several other Supreme Court opinions, states that for one to be a “Natural Born Citizen” both of one’s parents must be U.S. Citizens.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Eligibility, Obama and the Coming Crisis

Posted on by

Tomorrow, a storm will strike in Georgia. It could well be a storm of epic proportions. It will be a political storm from which a Constitutional crisis could well arise.

It will take place in a Georgia courtroom.

Obama’s eligibility to serve as President is on the line.

It’s been a long and hard road for Dr. Orly Taitz and the Liberty Legal Foundation, which will represent the plaintiffs in court tomorrow, what they have been working toward may well create the perfect storm.

Make no mistake, while the outcome of this case is at the state level, and while it will not, if successful by the plaintiffs, remove Obama from office, it could set the stage for that ultimate showdown.

This case, brought forth in Georgia, will decide, before appeals, whether or not Obama is qualified, by virtue of the constitution, to appear on Georgia’s ballot in 2012.

This IS huge.

There are other such cases being formulated and one, in the state of California, which is pending.

The case against Obama’s eligibility hinges on the definition of “Natural Born Citizen” and the constitution clearly states one must BE a Natural Born Citizen in order to serve as president.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Is it Time for Santorum To Exit? Don’t be Too Hasty!!!

Posted on by

After the amazing comeback by Newt Gingrich in South Carolina, a stunning 25 point turn around in just 5 days, and his landslide victory in yesterday’s primary, we have a whole new race going forward.

Tomorrow night, again, there will be but 4 on the debate stage in Florida.

Many now seem to believe it’s really a 2 man race and, it’s hard to argue that point.

Hard doesn’t mean impossible.

Ron Paul’s followers will get nasty when they read this but that’s not exactly a change of direction for them. They insist that Paul will win, that he’s the only one who is qualified, he’s able to walk on water etc.

Reality speaks volumes to all but them.

Ron Paul will not receive the nomination. His obtuse views of foreign policy just won’t allow it.

Then there are those, including Ron Paul’s followers who believe it’s high time Rick Santorum bows out. Santorum’s oh so narrow victory in Iowa and his lack of financial support just isn’t enough to keep him in they say.

Pretty much everybody except Rick Santorum’s ardent supporters say it’s time for Rick to bow out.

Pretty much everybody.

Not me.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

SOTU…A Look Back and a Look Forward

Posted on by

On Tuesday night, less than 48 hours before Obama has been subpoenaed to appear in a Georgia courtroom in a case regarding his eligibility to serve, he will deliver the 2012 State of the Union address.

We can hardly wait.

This year’s SOTU is expected to focus on “A Return to American Values.”

Obama? American Values?

Isn’t that an oxymoron of sorts?

“American Values, of course, being the “Oxy”…

Before we look too deep into the shallow end of the pool regarding the 2012 SOTU speech, shall we look back at the 2011 version?

Remember when…

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share