Be sure to Click LIKE at the bottom of this commentary, and share it everywhere!! By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot – Commentary

Imagine if you will, getting a party invite sent to you that read…”You are cordially invited to a surprise party. The guest of honor will be in the designated location. We will all shout ‘SURPRISE’ at the designated time.”

Would you go to said party? If so…where would you go? What time would you arrive? For whom is the party being thrown?

I have to ask these questions because, essentially, that’s what the supposed double top secret communications contained regarding the “Signal” chat referenced by the Atlantic so-called journalist who has tried to set off a firestorm of legal activity over being inadvertently included on a chat thread.

That thread involved back and forth dialog about the U.S. attack on the Houthi terrorist organization a couple of weeks ago in Yeman. The so-called journalist, Jeffery Goldberg, last week released text from that thread a day after saying he couldn’t possibly put it out in the public domain because it contained high-level, classified info that would damage our national security.

Here’s what he released under the sensational headline: “Here Are the Attack Plans That Trump’s Advisors Shared on Signal.” Here we go…

“1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)”

“1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)”

“1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package)”

“1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier ‘Trigger Based’ targets)”

“1536 F-18 2nd Strike Starts – also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched.”

“MORE TO FOLLOW (per timeline)”

“We are currently clean on OPSEC”

That’s it. Those are supposedly the classified bits of intel that were damaging to our national security. According to our Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth who was in on that chat thread posted the following on X in response to the Atlantic and their bogus claims: “So, let’s me get this straight. The Atlantic released the so-called “war plans” and those “plans” include: No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods. And no classified information. Those are some really shitty war plans.”

In other words……”You are cordially invited to a surprise party. The guest of honor will be in the designated location. We will all shout ‘SURPRISE’ at the designated time.”

But of course, liberals being lunatics and having no direction, no plan and no leadership are trying like hell to use this in their political favor, and just like everything else they try…they are abjectly failing. Mark Kelly, a former astroNUT, who just a couple of weeks ago was calling Elon Musk an “asshole” while Musk’s SpaceX was actively rescuing two astroNAUTs stranded at the space station for nine months by the Biden regime and selling the Tesla he bought because “climate change” was about to destroy the planet…and buying a gas-guzzling Chevy Tahoe…because “climate change” really isn’t all it’s been cracked up to be by liberal crack-pots, is DEMANDING that Hegseth either RESIGN, or be FIRED.

Oh, but it doesn’t stop there.

Last week, some outfit, probably funded by a George Soros shell company, ‘American Oversight,’ filed a LAWSUIT over the whole nothing burger. That LAWSUIT names, “Hegseth; Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard; CIA Director John Ratcliffe; Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent; Secretary of State Marco Rubio, as well as the National Archives and Records Administration, as defendants.”

Ummm…the Secretary of the Treasury?

Frankly, I’m shocked the LAWSUIT failed to name the guy who installed Trump’s Diet Coke button in the Oval Office, whoever organizes Melania Trump’s wardrobe so she looks like a bazillion bucks every time she shows up someplace, and the greens keeper at the golf course where Trump was playing 18 when the bombing took place as defendants as well.

The lawsuit notes that Signal group chats can be set up to delete messages after a certain time threshold, leading to the POSSIBILITY that certain records were illegally destroyed. That, supposedly, is what the LAWSUIT is all about. This liberal lunatic asylum, ‘American Oversight,’ is claiming their LAWSUIT centers on the Federal Records Act, which “requires federal officials to preserve communications related to official government business,” and those protocols were not followed.

Oh, you mean like when Hillary Clinton deleted 32,000 emails from the illegal personal server she hid in the bathroom or her house and then bleach-bitted, or all the hard-drives and cell phones Hillary destroyed with hammers to prevent her actual compromising of national security from ending up as exhibits 1 through 40,000? How about Lois Lerner, the former boss of the IRS who destroyed evidence of the targeting of Conservatives under the Obama regime? J. Russell George, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, testified before the House Oversight Committee that “422 tapes most likely to have contained Ms. Lerner’s emails from 2010 and 2011 were erased in March 2014, [and] we were unable to recover all of the missing emails.”

George went on to state in his testimony that “there could be as many as 23,000 to 24,000 additional missing emails.” In fact, rather than preserving the emails, Lerner’s hard drive had been “recycled and potentially shredded.”

‘American Oversight’ wasn’t founded until 2017, so they weren’t around for either Hillary’s or Lois’ intentional destruction of records to avoid prosecution, but here’s what it says on their website: “American Oversight is a nonpartisan, nonprofit watchdog that advances truth, accountability, and democracy by enforcing the public’s right to government records.” Here’s what ‘Influence Watch’ has to say about ‘American Oversight,’ “American Oversight (AO) is an activist and litigation organization focusing on filing open records requests targeting Republican interests, especially the administration of President Donald Trump. The organization was launched in March 2017, following and in response to the election of President Trump’s inauguration and is headquartered in Washington, D.C.¹ As of January 2019, all of its investigations and litigation are directed at Republicans; it claims to be “the top Freedom of Information Act litigator investigating the Trump administration,” with more than 1000 open records requests and 56 lawsuits filed in 2018.”

Did you get that? “ALL of its investigations and litigation are directed at Republicans.

“American Oversight is nonpartisan…” my unwoke ass.

‘American Oversight’ was, at least in part, created or conceived of by David Brock, a liberal lawfare lune, as an off-shoot of CREW, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which over the years has indeed been partially funded by George Soros. Brock apparently was the idea man who suggested the need for CREW to have a stronger litigation arm. Brock, by the way, was Hillary Clinton’s “fixer” CREW is now the lawfare arm of American Oversight. From 2016-2019, Norm Eisen served as Board Chair and Co-Counsel for CREW. Eisen is now reportedly back with CREW. Alex Wong, Mike Waltz’s Chief of Staff used to do pro-bono work for…CREW. Both Eisen and Brock, along with CREW and American Oversight exist to target President Trump, and for virtually no other discernable reason at this point.

Let’s talk about coordination here. The attack against the Houthis occurred on March, 16^th and nobody knew about Goldberg being privy to the Signal chat until the ‘Atlantic” went to press on March, 25. Then, just one day later, ‘American oversight’ files their lawsuit. ‘American Oversight’ seemed to have their lawsuit regarding the Signal Chat thing ready and waiting to be filed as soon as Goldberg published his story.

Oh, but it gets even MORE partisan…

The so-called “judge” who somehow caught this LAWSUIT case is none other than  U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, the exact same Obama appointed “judge” trying to unconstitutionally prevent President Trump from deporting illegal aliens, and to be perfectly clear, Boasberg has a dog in this hunt…his daughter works for some group that, “focuses on criminal defense and advocacy” in her work for an organization that “strongly opposes mass deportations and legislation targeting members of criminal gangs.” And if that’s not enough of a conflict of interest for you, add to it the fact that Boasberg’s wife, Elizabeth Manson, has donated more than $10,000 to Democrats.

To be clear, last week, a federal appellate court declined to issue a stay on Boasberg’s court order in a suit challenging the Trump administration’s authority to deport Venezuelan nationals via a 1798 wartime law, meaning that the Trump administration still can’t deport those illegal aliens. Now that’s interesting because, back in 1948, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160, ruled that the very act now being utilized by President Trump to remove those illegal aliens was indeed constitutional AND stated CLEARLY in their ruling, “1. The Alien Enemy Act precludes judicial review of the removal order. Pp. 335 U. S. 163-166.”

If Boasberg is so willing to ignore both the Constitution AND a Supreme Court ruling on THAT topic, should we have any reason to believe his obvious anti-Trump bias won’t sway his ruling in the Signal chat case? My guess is that this robed activist so-called “judge” has already penned his ruling, and the case hasn’t yet even been heard.

So…is this Signal chat thing the dire scandal the mainstream liberal media propagandists and elected liberals are claiming it is?

Nope.

To qualify as such, it would have had to have ended in disaster, but it ended in a very successful strike against an international terrorist organization that has launched attacks against our military, our allies in the region and threatened international shipping through that region. No Americans were lost, not a single part of the plan was compromised, and the targets were destroyed.

Was the Signal chat thing a mistake?

Yep.

Somebody added the ‘Atlantic’s’ Goldberg into the chat group, and that should not have happened. National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz says it’s on him, even though one of his staffers most likely set up the Signal group chat. There is an internal investigation underway to find out who exactly is responsible, and how Goldberg’s contact number made its way into the mix. I also believe that steps are being taken to see to it that such a thing never happens again, and DOGE, with their cyber experts are tracking down the information in that regard.

Was the Signal chat mistake “the greatest threat to national security in history” as some media propagandists are bloviating?

No.

The greatest national security threat in our nation’s history was clearly Joe Biden and his sociopathic regime allowing tens of millions of unvetted illegal aliens from all over the world pour across our borders for four years…including hundreds who were on the terrorist watch list. Perhaps next on that list would be funding gain of function research at a Chinese bio-weapons lab, having the bio-weapon released into the world, covering up the origins of it and mandating a jab and countless boosters containing a DNA altering poison that killed people. How about trading five hardened terrorists for one American traitor? I’m sure we haven’t heard the last from those five terrorists. How about sending pallets of cash to the terrorist regime in Iran? You don’t suppose that’s a threat to national security do you? And let’s not forget Biden’s surrender to the Taliban which directly resulted in 13 dead U.S. Marines, Americans left behind that had to be rescued by private American groups and from which Biden gifted THAT terrorist group billions of dollars of our military equipment.

Good Lord, Obama and Hillary Clinton helped to create vacuums of power in Libya from Egypt and the ‘Arab Spring’ to the killing of Moammar Gaddafi in Libya which led to destabilization throughout the region putting our allies at grave risk and culminating in the murders of Americans at the hands of terrorists.

Liberals are acting like our national security is on life support…over a hiccup…to divert attention away from the implosion of their own sociopathic party.

That’s the bottom line.

Copyright © 2025 Craig Andresen / thenationalpatriot.com all rights reserved

Be sure to Click LIKE below, and share it everywhere!!

For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Diane Sori’s blog The Patriot Factor to read her latest article: The Good, Very Good, and Not So Ugly Truth

****************************************************************************************************