Be sure to Click LIKE at the bottom of this article, and share it everywhere!! By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

And so, the articles of impeachment produced by the House after weeks of star-chamber auditions of various witnesses who witnessed nothing, after weeks of public hearings featuring a parade of opinion witnesses, 2^nd and 3^rd hand hear say witnesses, and witnesses who put forth no facts other than that they never witnessed President Trump break any laws, have been delivered to the Senate.

Make no mistake, it wasn’t a rush to judgement by the liberals in the House. They predetermined President Trump’s guilt on November 9^th, 2016. What impeachment was, was a 3 year search for a crime that came up empty, and the articles of impeachment were to prevent something that Trump might do in the future, not in response to anything he’s already done.

The mainstream media echoed the talking points of congressional liberals who said Trump must be removed from office before he violates the Constitution, or engages in some future high crime or misdemeanor.

Think about that for a moment… That’s like saying that you should be locked up today for something you might possibly do 3 years from now. When you combine that absurdity with the way liberals in the House ran the impeachment hearings, a very nasty picture of what liberals intend to do with the system of justice in this country begins to emerge.

Am I being too cynical here? I don’t think so, and there’s evidence that backs my position on this point. Under what has become the preferred system of justice by liberals, one is guilty until proven innocent. Take the situation regarding Justice Brent Kavanaugh as a prime example.

Kavanaugh was presumed guilty, and was charged by liberals with clearing himself. President Trump’s case is no different is it? All it took for liberals to put Kavanaugh, and Trump on trial were allegations, and the guilty verdict was rendered without a shred of evidence. Then, it was up to those pronounced guilty by the liberal system of justice to somehow prove a negative.

Kavanauigh’s supposed crimes supposedly took place better than 30 years ago, but his supposed victims never filed a police report, nobody connected to either them, or Kavanaugh remembered anything of the sort taking place, and supposed witnesses to the crimes were easily shown to be lying about what they never witnessed in the first place.

Trump was accused of colluding with Russia in the 2016 campaign, was declared guilty by congressional liberals and by the mainstream media, but a 675 day, $40 million dollar investigation that employed 19 attorneys and 40 FBI agents along with a special prosecutor, issued 500 search warrants, more than 230 orders for communication records, early 50 authorized orders for the use of pen registers, and 13 evidence requests to foreign governments, then interviewed 500 witnesses found absolutely no evidence of Trump colluding with the Russians. Never mind that the Mueller report found zero evidence of collusion, following the agenda of a liberal system of justice, congressional liberals to this day cling to guilty until proven innocent mantra by saying that the report failed to exonerate President Trump.

Then, it was Ukraine, and a phone call which drew the liberal’s next guilty until proven innocent verdict which resulted in the aforementioned absurd parade of non-witnesses. First, Trump was proclaimed guilty of quid pro quo. Then it was extortion. Then it became bribery before the articles of impeachment listed “obstruction of congress,” and “abuse of power” neither of which are constitutionally impeachable, and both of which completely lacked evidence. But House liberals, having already found President Trump guilty based on baseless accusations, and having found no actual high crime or misdemeanor voted to impeach the President anyway. If our liberal lawmakers can do those things to a Supreme Court nominee, and to the President of the United States, what do you think is in store for you should they ever take full control of both the House, the Senate and the White House?

Registered democrats, and die-hard liberals shouldn’t think for one second that because of their politics, they would be immune to such a fundamentally anti-American system of justice, and if they are under the mistaken notion otherwise, they should take a long, hard look at such systems from history, and current socialist, or communist tyrannies. But, here we are, with the articles of impeachment now in the hands of the Senate, and thankfully, the Senate is in the hands of the Republicans.

This impeachment nonsense, this affront to the American system of justice, and the Constitution will fail, but that’s not all you need to know about it at this point. There are questions, and I believe there are answers, but the liberals don’t want you to know those answers. Why did the liberals launch this impeachment inquisition to begin with?

There are 2 basic reasons.

First, they hate President Trump for defeating their anointed candidate in 2016. Hillary’s election would have meant a defacto 3^rd term for Obama, and Trump denied them the opportunity to “fundamentally transform America.” Second, because liberals hate a strong America. They hate economic strength, they hate military strength, and they hate it when America has strength on the world stage which is a byproduct of both economic and military strength.

Why the rush to complete the House impeachment process before the end of last year?

Again, there are 2 basic reasons. First, because House liberals needed something, anything to cloud their abject failure regarding the Russian collusion manufactured nonsense, and the resulting damning evidence of lawlessness they engaged in to manufacture the Steele dossier, and the FBI corruption that led to the FISA warrants, and second, because they have a deep, and genuine fear of what President Trump might do in the future, which is win the 2020 presidential election.

Why, once the articles of impeachment were drawn up and approved by House liberals, based on what they claimed was an imminent threat to our nation posed by President Trump, did Nancy Pelosi suddenly go into stall mode and refuse to deliver the impeachment articles to the Senate as required by the Constitution?

Remember, at the onset of all of this, Pelosi was against it, but then she relented and allowed the impeachment process to begin. I believe she was led down the rabbit hole by the ilk of Schiff, Nadler, and the “squad” who employed a combination of tactics. I believe some of them claimed that they had the evidence, that the evidence was irrefutable, and that with regard to the Ukraine phone call, unlike the Russian collusion nonsense, they would make this accusation stick.

I also believe that some of them, the squad faction of the House, told the doddering Pelosi that if she didn’t move forward with impeachment, they would see to it that she was removed from the Speaker’s chair, and that position of power is very important to Pelosi. Further, I believe that Nancy Pelosi, afraid of losing the Speakership, and being gullible, advanced the impeachment process in the desperate hope that something, some high crime, some misdemeanor could be found somewhere, and thus justify the process. Pelosi went into stall mode because long before the articles of impeachment were voted on, she knew that the attempted coup had filed, and that she had been led down the proverbial rabbit hole, and that made her the most desperate liberal in Washington D.C..

She knew she had lost control of the House, and she knew it was far too late to stop the impending disaster. Pelosi had to do something, and out of desperation, she sat on the articles of impeachment, not to hatch them, but in a desperate attempt to hatch some way to save herself.

I believe she got Chuckie Schumer along with Schiff and Nadler to demand the Senate subpoena witnesses they didn’t subpoena in the House in a further desperate search for evidence that simply doesn’t exist. Pelosi knows that the trial in the Senate is an open and shut case, because the House failed to produce a shred of evidence against President Trump. What Pelosi has been thinking, I believe, is that by unconstitutionally trying to force the Senate into accepting the terms of the House, and holding out until they do, she might possibly be able to cling to her Speakership.

I believe Pelosi now realizes that by approving the impeachment process, she has created not only for the democrat party, but also for herself, a Star Trek-esque Kobayashi Maru, a no win scenario.

On the heels of the Mueller report debacle, Pelosi knew when the Ukraine phone call nonsense crashed and burned, she was finished. Pelosi also knew that the impeachment would go up in flames in the Senate, and after all the liberal posturing, and carefully leaked propaganda proved once again to be nothing but smoke and mirrors, her time as a liberal leader would come to an end. By trying in desperation to change the Senate’s autonomy, and force upon the Senate the will of the House, maybe, just maybe she could finagle a way out of her self-imposed Kobayashi Maru, but Nancy Pelosi is no Captain James T. Kirk.

Pelosi turned over the articles of impeachment because she knows the coup attempt is a failure, and because she knows she’s finished. Pelosi now knows that from here until November, she’s nothing but a figurehead, and after the House swings back to Republican control, she know that her time on the political stage is over.

So, what’s left for Pelosi? How is she dealing with 2 failed attempted coups under her watch, and a pending power shift in the House that she helped to engineer? She has become delusional. Watch as Pelosi wraps a propaganda laden press conference a week ago. She has “responsibilities to save our country from peril this weekend.” It is notable that even the mainstream liberal propaganda machine otherwise known as the media laughed at the very thought of it, but save our country from what, exactly?

Save it from economic prosperity? Save it from individual freedom and liberty? Save it from a system of justice that presumes innocence? Come on Nancy, from what peril are you saving our country? From the perils of a front and center position on the world stage? From the perils of lower taxes and fewer government regulations?

Are you saving our country from the perils of being energy independent, being a superpower, sovereignty, or the perils of religious and expressive freedom? Maybe she thinks she’s the caped crusader who will save us all from judges who adhere to the Constitution rather than to political activism.

Maybe she thinks she’s the superhero who will save our country from life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Perhaps Nancy is saving our country from historically high employment, and historically low unemployment, from higher wages, and more job creation opportunities.

Nancy Pelosi said, “I have, unfortunately, responsibilities to save our country from peril this weekend.” Well, whatever she’s saving our country from can’t be too terribly dire. Apparently, it’s only a one weekend job. Pelosi isn’t trying to save our country from anything. She’s desperately trying to find a way to save her own legacy which is sliding into oblivion faster than her face. My prediction is that after the November election, Nancy Pelosi will retire, to spend more time with her family, because even she knows that there’s not enough Botox in California to save her political face.

Copyright © Craig Andresen/thenationalpatriot.com 2020/ All rights reserved ************************************************************************************************* For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Diane Sori’s blog The Patriot Factor to read her latest article,  The Hidden Truths Behind Australia’s Bushfires  ************************************************************************************************

Hope you can tune in at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history…or on Tune-In at:https://tunein.com/radio/American-Political-Radio-s273246/