Be sure to Click LIKE at the bottom of this article, and share it everywhere!!

By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

Up is down, left is right, right is wrong, and lies equal the truth. That is the liberal view of the world around them, and while it seems like something new, it isn’t.

The decidedly backwards mindset of today’s liberals has nearly always been their calling card, and when they have historically been outed as being on the wrong side of any given issue, they ultimately accuse Republicans of the wrong they, themselves commit.

We all know that it was Hillary and the democrats who were engaged in collusion with the Russians leading up to the 2016 election, and Uranium One is proof positive of that. It was Hillary and the democrats who conspired with Russian agents to manufacture the Steele dossier which would then be used in an attempt to frame first candidate, and later President Trump.

It was Hillary and the Democrats who engaged in obstruction of Justice when they back-shelfed and called off the investigation into Hillary’s email scandal, and further obstruction came at the hands of Hillary and the democrats with the erasing of 32,000 emails, the destruction of hard drives, bleach-bitting, the Awan brothers, and so much more including the hiding of Hillary’s private server in somebody’s office bathroom.

But who are democrats blaming for and accusing of Russian Collusion and obstruction? President Trump, his campaign, his cabinet members and various other Republicans.

Democrats projecting their own misdeeds and crimes on the other side of the aisle is bad enough, but there is something much more interesting going on.

Ours is a nation of laws, and the bedrock upon which the very foundation of our laws is set, is something called “the presumption of innocence.” Anyone accused of a crime is supposed to be presumed innocent, and the burden of proof falls upon the accuser. Democrats today, in a right is wrong, and up is down mindset, have determined that President Trump is guilty, regardless of a complete lack of evidence to the contrary, and they are actively trying to beat the bedrock of our nation’s laws into sand to establish his guilt unless he can prove his innocence.

There are, and have been nations where the presumption of guilt are the laws of the land, and perhaps the most obvious nation to make the presumption of guilt their calling card was the old Soviet Union.

Consider what liberals tried to do to Justice Brett Kavanaugh. They accused him of crimes some 35 years old. There was absolutely no proof of those crimes, and in some cases, Kavanaugh wasn’t even in the town where the crimes he was accused of took place when his accusers said those crimes took place. It made absolutely no difference to democrats and liberals, as they found him guilty in a kangaroo court of public opinion, while trying to force him to prove his innocence.

I now believe that the Kavanaugh debacle was the trial balloon for what liberals are trying to do with President Trump, but rather than in the court of public opinion, as was the case with Kavanaugh, liberals are moving their presumption of guilt against Trump to the next level.

Last week, Nancy Pelosi held an emergency, behind closed doors meeting with the democrat caucus after which she stated, “We do believe it is important to follow the facts. We believe that no one is above the law, including the president of the United States. And we believe that the president of the United States is engaged in a cover-up—a cover-up. And that was the nature of the meeting.”

Pelosi, and the democrats “believe” that the President of the United States, “is engaged in a cove-up – a cover-up.” A cover-up of what, exactly? A cover-up to conceal a crime that he did not commit, and a cover-up of a crime for which democrats have absolutely no evidence to support?

In fact, after a two year investigation that cost the American taxpayers some $35 million dollars, saw 2800 subpoenas served, and more than 500 witnesses interviewed, the evidence showed clearly that President Trump did not collude with the Russians, nor did he obstruct justice, but despite the evidence of innocence, democrats and liberals have found President Trump guilty of all baseless accusations.

Let me explain this in personal terms.

Let’s say a bank was robbed in your town, and somebody who doesn’t like you because you hurt their feelings accuses you of the crime. An investigation is launched, with you as the suspect. Authorities obtain search warrants illegally, using manufactured documents, and your home is raided, your office is searched, your associate’s homes are raided, you and your friends are spied upon, and after an exhaustive investigation, the lead investigator releases a report stating that there simply isn’t any evidence to prove you robbed the bank.

Case closed? You’re off the hook. Right?

Wrong.

Now, because somebody doesn’t like you, because you hurt their feelings, the government unleashing a torrent of subpoenas to haul everybody you know into a “hearing” based on their determination of your guilt, and they have to prove both your associates, and your own innocence in a kangaroo court trial, and the goal of those who don’t like you is to see to it that you’re fired from your job, ruined, shamed and pilloried for a crime you did not commit.

That is exactly what is happening right now to President Trump.

Now, consider this. That person who accused you of robbing that bank, just like those who accused President Trump of collusion and obstruction, is the very person who actually robbed the bank, because the very people who colluded with Russia, and obstructed justice are the same people who accused President Trump of the crimes they, themselves committed.

Here’s the obvious question. If democrats and liberals are willing to abandon the rule of law in such a high profile case as the one they’re engaged in against President Trump, would they also be willing to initiate presumed guilt against average American citizens? Sadly, but not surprisingly, the answer is yes, and we’re already seeing it play out on the streets.

Democrats and liberals have for years now presumed all police officers are guilty of crimes, and without so much as an investigation, they have shown themselves to be judge, jury, and in far too many cases, the executioners. All white people are presumed guilty of systemic racism by liberals. All men are presumed guilty of sex crimes by liberals, and all Conservatives are presumed guilty of hate crimes by liberals. No investigation, no trial, no evidence needed.

Still not convinced? How many times over the past couple of years have false racism, or false hate crimes been alleged against people who were completely innocent? Who makes such false allegations? Who are their targets? Who takes those presumptions of guilt and uses their power to condemn the accused on a national scale?

I’ll answer those questions shortly, but first, let’s examine the desired outcome the democrats and liberals are hoping to achieve. Democrats and liberals want a socialist, if not a communist society, and the rule of law, innocent until proven guilty doesn’t allow for that. I suspect that the democrat party, in the wake of their 2016 loss, is now trying to expedite the end of the rule of law by abandoning the bedrock of our system of justice in favor of a system by which they can find those with whom they disagree politically, guilty of even completely fabricated crimes.

To answer the above questions, one must first identify the template for the actions now being undertaken by democrats and liberals, and that template is the old Soviet Union. Who used average citizens to turn in other average citizens for affronts, real or imagined against the agenda of the government? The Soviet Union. Who used the power of their government agencies to spy on their own citizens? The Soviet Union. Whose standard system of justice was the presumption of guilt? The Soviet Union, and who used their media to fan the flames and condemn those that the government perceived as their enemies? The Soviet Union.

I contend that the DNC is no longer content to be a political party. They intend on being the ruling party, which means that the democrat party is now acting like the Soviet Politburo. With that in mind, under Obama, the U.S. Politburo weaponized the FBI and the CIA, as well as the courts, turning them into the KGB and setting them loose to spy on American citizens. The U.S. Politburo has also empowered their party faithful to make false allegations against any who fail to toe the Politburo party line, and the mainstream media in our country has happily taken the role of the old Soviet Pravda.

A couple of cases in point. A 17 year old kid stands on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial wearing a hat supporting the Politburo’s sworn enemy and does absolutely nothing wrong when confronted by a member of the party faithful who was trying to incite the young man into taking action. Party faithful take to social media to accuse and condemn the 17 year old as a racist presumed guilty of a hate crime. Pravda fans the flames and announces the guilty verdict nationwide, while the Politburo itself sits back and smiles at what they created.

Case in point number two, a gay black man hires two Nigerian brothers to rough him up in Chicago, and blames it on white Trump supporters. The goal is to brand Trump supporters, all of them, as racists and anti-gay. The fake story is seized upon by Pravda, spread like wildfire and again, the Politburo smiles.

The hypocrisy is that the democrats and liberals are pretending to be on fire angry about Russia meddling in our elections, while the very same democrats and liberals are openly advocating for having non U.S. citizens vote in our elections.

The ultimate irony however, is this. The democrat party has declared President Trump guilty, despite the findings of a two year investigation, of conspiring and colluding with the Russians, because they claim Russia is the enemy of the State, when in fact, the democrats and liberals have adopted the tactics of the Soviet Politburo to do it.

While it has been said that one person, President Trump, is all that stands between our Constitutional rule of law and communism, I suggest that is not the case at all. In fact, it is We the People who must make the difference. We the voters who elected President Trump in 2016, must do so again, and we must hold the Senate and take back the house in 2020 or we will no longer recognize America.

The first step in that process is having a full understanding of just what democrats and liberals are doing, the tactics they’re using, and what their desired outcome is.Never forget, we are but one election from a new Politboro rising.

And now…you know.

© Craig Andresen/thenationalpatriot.com 2019

************************************************************************************************
For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner, Diane Sori’s blog The Patriot Factor to read his latest article, 7th Century Norms in a 21st Century World

*************************************************************************************************

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS…LIVE!

Friday, May 31st, from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss ‘7th Century Norms in a 21st Century World’; Politburo Rising’; and important news of the day.

Hope you can tune in at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history...or on Tune-In at: https://tunein.com/radio/American-Political-Radio-s273246/