Be sure to Click LIKE at the bottom of this article, and share it everywhere!!

By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

So, Christine Ford, is a professor at Palo Alto University, and a registered democrat who federal campaign finance records show made donations earmarked for Bernie Sanders, the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and been a part of anti-Trump movements,(*!). has come forward as the anonymous source behind the Diane Feinstein letter regarding the supposed sexual misconduct of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

I hardly know where to begin, but I suppose it would be best to take it from the top.

Feinstein claims to have had in her possession, since July, a letter sent to her by this woman, Ford, in which Ford makes the claim that as a teen, Kavanaugh attacked her sexually some 35 years ago.

Feinstein did nothing with that letter until September 12^th, just days ahead of a vote by the Senate Judiciary Committee on Kavanaugh, and while that in and of itself is disturbing, more disturbing still is the fact that this woman, Ford, has kept abjectly silent about the alleged attack…for 35 years.

According to Ford, it all happened on a summer day in the 1980s at a Maryland house where teens had gathered.

Which year in the 1980’s?

Ford doesn’t say.

What house in Maryland?

Ford doesn’t remember who owned the house.

Why were there teens at that house on that day in whatever year that it all supposedly happened?

Ford can’t remember that either.

What’s even more interesting is that Ford now claims that the supposed events of that mysterious day, in that mysterious year and that mysterious house…”derailed” her for years, and left her, “unable to have healthy relationships with men.”

She also claims that, “I thought he might inadvertently kill me.”

So let’s just see if we have this all straight…

This woman, the one making these allegations claims that a sexual attack took place that she thought might kill her, and derailed her for years making it impossible to have healthy relationships with men…at a house she doesn’t know who owns, on a date she doesn’t know, in a year she doesn’t remember, and that she never said a word about it until a couples therapy session in 2012…and then wrote about it to Feinstein last July?

I find it more than difficult to believe that anyone could go through something like that and not remember when, or exactly where it happened. And don’t give me that stuff regarding traumatic events making things fuzzy…that isn’t the case here.

This woman, Ford, claims to remember quite a bit about the alleged assault…she remembers Kavanaugh…she remembers some other boy by the name of Mark Judge being there and being a part of the alleged attack, she claims to remember both boys being, in her words, “stumbling drunk,” and she claims to remember such details as wearing a one piece bathing suit as well as clothes, supposedly Kavanaugh trying to pull both her bathing suit and her clothes off, Judge barreling into them knocking them all down, and supposedly Kavanaugh putting his hand over her mouth to prevent her from screaming.

She supposedly remembers all of that, but she can’t remember who owned the house, where the house was, or what year this all supposedly happened?

Here are a few other things Ford supposedly remembers…there was loud rock and roll music blaring, and there were four people in the house.

How convenient.

By the way, whoever the therapist was from that couples session back in 2012, provided “contemporaneous notes” to the Washington Post for their hit piece on Kavanaugh, and those notes contain a very telling revelation…according to that therapists notes, Ford was attacked by four boys, but Ford told the Washington Post that the therapist confused the number of people who attacker her with the number of people who were at the house. This is very interesting and I’ll explain why in just a moment.

Last Friday, Brett Kavanaugh released a statement through the White House regarding the allegations stating, “I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation. I did not do this back in high school or at any time.”

Some 65 women who have known Kavanaugh for years going all the way back to his high school days have come forward to state that they have never known Brett Kavanaugh to be anything but a gentleman and respectful of women.

“We are women who have known Brett Kavanaugh for more than 35 years and knew him while he attended high school between 1979 and 1983. For the entire time we have known Brett Kavanaugh, he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect. We strongly believe it is important to convey this information to the Committee at this time.”

Mark Judge, then a teen and now the other boy accused by Ford also issued a statement saying that the claims were “just absolutely nuts” and insisting that “I never saw Brett act that way.” Mark Judge is now a Conservative columnist.

So…let me now get back to the therapist’s notes…according to Ford, the therapist who said that Ford was attacked by four people mistook the number of attackers for the number of people in the house.

Ford “remembers” there was only four people in the house…she “remembers” two of them being Kavanaugh and Mark Judge…she “remembers” escaping the bedroom and into a bathroom…but she doesn’t “remember” who owned the house? Let’s just look at that analytically…there were, according to Ford, four people in that mystery house…Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge…and herself make three. It would then be logical to conclude that whoever the fourth person was…lived in the house…but she apparently doesn’t know who that person was.

Isn’t that convenient?

Also contained in the therapist’s notes was Ford recalling that her alleged attackers were “from an elitist boys’ school.” This too is significant because she didn’t name the school. Kavanaugh and Mark Judge were classmates at an all boys school, Georgetown Prepartory School. This leads me to believe that until that mysterious day, in that mysterious house, Ford didn’t know either Kavanaugh or Judge because had she known them, she would have known the name of their school.

Interesting.

And, according to the therapist’s notes, not only could Ford not remember who owned the house, she couldn’t remember why she was at the house. So…we are supposed to believe that this teenage girl is in a house with nobody she previously knew, where an alleged sexual attack against her takes place, and not only can’t she remember who owned the house or where that house was…she can’t even remember why she was there…but she remembers in detail everything that happened in that house that day?

So, why now, aside from the obvious, would this Ford woman suddenly want to make a federal case out of something from 35 years ago that may well never have actually happened?

Because she now claims it is her civic duty to come forward. “Now I feel like my civic responsibility is outweighing my anguish and terror about retaliation.”

Brett Kavanaugh has been through six federal background checks throughout his career…and he’s a federal judge which means he’s been through the nomination process before…but only now does this Ford believe she’s been faced with “civic responsibility?”

And speaking of “civic responsibility” let’s talk here about Diane Feinstein who probably wouldn’t know “civic responsibility” if it bit her…she has supposedly held onto this letter since July and never uttered a single word about it until September 12^th. She has met with Kavanaugh…and said nothing. She sat there in hearings day after day…and said nothing.

Only now, just days before the Senate Judiciary Committee is set to vote does she suddenly feel the need to exercise her “civic responsibility?”

Here’s the real deal…unable to stop the confirmation process of Brett Kavanaugh, and as a last ditch effort of desperation, Feinstein has released a letter of allegations she knows full well to be so full of holes it would rival a sieve, hoping that the Senate Committee, or the full Senate would be so frightened of not bowing to 35 year old allegations that they will not confirm Kavanaugh.

Christine Ford claims all of this happened 35 years ago, but she filed no report of it back then, nor did she tell anyone about it back then. She admits that she remained completely silent about it until 2012…never letting her alleged cat out of the bag until this past July…and apparently giving her therapist permission to share notes from her couples session with the Washington Post.

In fact, Ford told the Washington Post that “My biggest fear was, do I look like someone just attacked me? [I thought], I’m not ever telling anyone this. This is nothing, it didn’t happen, and he didn’t rape me.”

The question is…can Ford corroborate her baseless allegations?

According to Ford’s attorney, it’s not her clients job to corroborate her allegations.

Let me be a clear and as succinct about this as possible…

If you are, or even think you are the victim of an illegal act, including a sexual assault, and you don’t make a case of it immediately, do not expect anybody to take you seriously 35 years down the road.

If your sense of “civic responsibility” doesn’t kick in to the point that you call the police absolutely as soon as possible after being sexually assaulted, as Christine Ford claims she was…know that 35 years later, when you claim your sense of “civic responsibility” kicks in you will not be believed. Christine Ford’s sense of “civic responsibility” seems to have only become an issue when it suddenly became politically expedient for the party to whom she is registered, and there is a total and complete lack of any evidence of any kind to back up her claims.

In fact, at no time during Kavanaugh’s career…not when he became an attorney, not when he became a judge, not when he was nominated to a federal bench…at no time did Ford feel a “civic responsibility” to say anything publicly…until he was nominated to the United States Supreme Court at a point in time when liberals are absolutely desperate to keep a good man off of the nation’s highest court.

Liberals are counting on the notion that just because a woman makes a 35 year old allegation, every Senator will, even in the light of there being not a shred of proof of said allegation, take the woman’s word for it  to avoid the “optics” of such a confirmation.

To do so would be to accept that Kavanaugh is guilty and condemn him unless he can prove himself innocent…a verdict that would surely be overturned by the very court to which Kavanaugh has been nominated.

Now, according to Feinstein, she’s sent the letter in question to the FBI for an “investigation.”  The FBI? Is that the same FBI that paid for a fraudulent dossier on then candidate Donald Trump? The same FBI whose suits were, and are anti-Trump and pro Hillary? Are we talking about the same FBI that leaked information to the media? That FBI is going to investigate Kavanaugh based on 35 year old allegations where not a shred of proof exists?

Why? To find Kavanaugh guilty in the only court that would even hear such a case…the court of public opinion. For liberals, where no proof exists, where no evidence exists, where nothing but abject silence has existed for 35 years…all that’s necessary for a smear campaign is a baseless allegation…and in this case…that’s all they have.

Finally, let me put Feinstein’s demands to have Kavanaugh investigated, and smear his name to the ultimate test. According to Feinstein, Kavanaugh allegedly sexually attacked Ford some 35 years ago and based solely on that allegation alone, Kavanaugh should be ruined. However…40 years after Feinstyein’s pal, Ted Kennedy drove his car off a bridge and left a woman inside that car to drown and die while he went home to sober up…Feinstein praised Kennedy at his funeral saying, “Ted Kennedy dedicated his life to ensuring that America would be a better place. A better place for the poor, for children, for seniors and a better place for all Americans.”

Here is a video of Feinstein fondly remembering the lady-killer, Ted Kennedy…

This wasn’t some 35 year old allegation. Kennedy admitted he was driving the car in which Mary Jo Kopechne was killed. He admitted to leaving the scene of a death for which he was responsible. Feinstein adored the lech Ted Kennedy, a man known for cruising in the back of a limo trolling for women while a U.S. Senator.

Kennedy got a two month suspended jail sentence for killing Mary Kopechne, and 40 years later, Feinstein praised the killer. Now, 35 years after only allegedly committing a sexual assault of which absolutely no evidence exists, and after more than five dozen women have publicly spoken in favor of the accused, Feinstein wants Kavanaugh ruined.

Ms. Feinstein…were someone to simply allege, sans an iota of proof, that you committed a crime 35 years ago…would you demand an FBI investigation of yourself? Would you resign from the Senate?

Ms. Feinstein…were someone to simply allege, sans an iota of proof, that while in high school, some 35 years ago, Christine Blasey, (now Christine Ford) was a teenaged slut that lured two boys to a bedroom at a drunken party leading them on and then suddenly chickened out…would you demand an investigation into her and smear her name?

And before you answer either of those questions Ms. Feinstein…remember…using your own tactics, all it takes to be considered guilty is a baseless allegation.

Ms. Feinstein…we’re waiting for your answers.

Ms. Feinstein?

In 2016, Feinstein said of Hillary Clinton’s emails, “The only reason to hold Secretary Clinton responsible for emails that didn’t originate with her is for political points, and that’s what we’ve seen over the past several months.” There exists a mountain of actual evidence that with regard to her emails and private server, Hillary violated the Espionage Act but does Feinstein want Hillary held accountable?

Regarding Benghazi, Feinstein called the House Select Committee investigation into Hillary “a hunting mission for a lynch mob,” even though there exists a mountain of evidence that Hillary actually committed treason along with her boss, Barack Hussein Obama, but does Feinstein want to delve into a treason investigation against Hillary and Obama replete with the Constitutionally prescribed punishment…a long drop at the end of a short rope?

Of course not but Feinstein is more than willing to, “for political points” to gin up a lynch mob to hang Kavanaugh over baseless 35 year old allegations.

Bottom line…this smear tactic deployed by liberals was enough to keep Judge Roy Moore from being elected but failed when deployed against Justice Clarence Thomas. Let’s hope the Senate can smell the BS and avoid stepping in it this time because where there is abjectly no evidence of a crime being committed, and only a 35 year old baseless allegation that is transparently politically motivated…no crime was committed and Kavanaugh should, and I believe will be confirmed as the newest Supreme Court Justice post haste.

(*!)*You can read more about Christine Blasey Ford by clicking this link.

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS…LIVE!

Today, Tuesday, September 18th from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori welcome special guest Mudah Zahran, the Secretary General of the Jordanian Opposition Coalition; discuss ‘Politics and the Creation of a New Sex’; and ‘ Liberals Say It’s Trump’s Fault – Any Port in a Storm’.

Hope you can tune in at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history