How’s that again?

Seriously…Did Obama REALLY say that???

“I think we have both a moral obligation and a national security interest in both a) ending the slaughter in Syria and b) ensuring a stable Syria.”

Yes.

That is exactly what he said.

So…NOW he wants to talk about “MORAL OBLIGATIONS???”

Okay…

Let’s talk about “MORAL OBLIGATIONS.”

HILLARY CLINTON had a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to ensure that our diplomats were protected in Libya.

Under HER “leadership,” no doubt guided by her “MORAL OBLIGATIONS,” our security personnel in Libya, specifically Benghazi, were drawn DOWN.

Under her “MORAL OBLIGATION” to ensure their safety…

REPEATED requests for MORE security in Benghazi were DENIED.

Did Hillary Clinton NOT have a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to actually READ her emails and memos related to security matters in Benghazi?

Yes…She did but…She passed on that “MORAL OBLIGATION” too.

Hillary Clinton also had a clear “MORAL OBLIGATION” to tell the committee what happened in Benghazi that night one year ago and, rather than FULFILL that “MORAL OBLIGATION” she screeched at those asking the questions…

“WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT, DOES IT MAKE???”

And NOW…Obama wants to talk about “MORAL OBLIGATIONS????”

Okay…

Didn’t OBAMA have a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to do everything possible to save the lives of those 4 Americans in Benghazi on September 11^th, 2012?

Damn right he did.

Didn’t OBAMA himself have a “MORAL OBLIGATION” not to leave them behind?

Damn right he did.

Didn’t OBAMA have a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to send in someone…ANYONE…after the attacks to get to the truth as FAST as possible???

DAMN RIGHT HE DID.

Did Obama fulfill any of THOSE “MORAL OBLIGATIONS???

No.

NO HE DID NOT.

But he DID call our dead Americans, “bumps in the road” and said that what happened was, “not optimal.”

And now he wants to talk about MORAL OBLIGATIONS???”

Did Obama have a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to stay on top of what was happening during those attacks?

Yes.

Did he?

No.

He disappeared after 20 minutes and his whereabouts for the next 8 hours are, to this day, a mystery.

HE DIDN’T EVEN CHECK BACK IN, FOR UPDATES ON THE ATTACKS, DURING THOSE 8 HOURS and he wants to talk about “MORAL OBLIGATIONS?????”

After the attacks…Obama had a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to tell the nation what happened.

HE AND HILLARY…TOLD THE NATION, FOR THE NEXT 3 WEEKS, THAT A YOU TUBE VIDEO WAS TO BLAME even though, as the attack was in progress, both he and Hillary knew full well…It was a terrorist attack.

The 2 of them stood, between the flag-draped caskets of those 4 Americans and their families and told THEM…It was a You Tube video that was responsible with no regard whatsoever to their…”MORAL OBLIGATIONS!!!”

Obama told the nation that those responsible would be brought to justice.

Obama told the families of those killed in those attacks that those responsible would be brought to justice.

HIS “MORAL OBLIGATION” TO DO SO DIDN’T EVEN EXTEND TO A SIDEWALK CAFÉ IN BENGHAZI WHERE JOURNALISTS SPOKE WITH THOSE RESPONSIBLE BUT…NOBODY FROM OBAMA’S ADMINISTRATION EVER…EVER HAS!!!

And now…NOW…He wants to talk about…”MORAL OBLIGATIONS???”

Let me tell you a little something about “MORAL OBLIGATIONS.”

 Lieutenant Colonel Andrew Wood, Site Security Team (SST) Commander in Libya from 12 February to 14 August of 2012 had a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to request more security for the diplomats under his protection in Benghazi.

HE FULFILLED THAT OBLIGATION…OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

LTC Andrew Wood had a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to request that his team NOT be FURTHER drawn down.

HE FULFILLED THAT MORAL OBLIGATION OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

LTC Andrew Wood also had a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to come forward and tell the House Oversight Committee the truth.

HE FULFILLED THAT MORAL OBLIGATION.

 The British diplomatic corps had a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to get their people out of harm’s way when it became obvious that Benghazi was under the control of the terrorist organization, Ansar al-Sharia.

The Red Cross had a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to get THEIR people out of Benghazi for the same reason.

THEY BOTH FULFILLED THEIR MORAL OBLIGATIONS while the Obama administration HIRED Ansar al-Sharia as THEIR personnel’s SECURITY.

Ambassador Stevens had a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to follow the orders of his superiors at the state department and Sean Smith had a “MORAL OBLIGATION”  to follow the lead of his boss, Ambassador Stevens while they were in Benghazi.

THEY FULFILLED THEIR MORAL OBLIGATIONS.

Tyrone Woods, a former Navy SEAL assigned to the CIA annex in Benghazi on September 11^th, 2012, felt the “MORAL OBLIGATION” to assist, in any way he could and at great risk to his own life, those trapped a mile away and under a terrorist attack in our Benghazi consulate.

Glen Doherty, another former Navy SEAL, had a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to get the hell out of TRIPOLI and TO Benghazi to assist those under attack and to do so at the risk of his career and his life.

BECAUSE BOTH TYRONE WOODS AND GLEN DOHERTY FULFILLED THEIR MORAL OBLIGATIONS, DOZENS OF LIVES WERE SAVED THAT NIGHT.

Their lives…All of their lives…Were lost.

Gregory Hicks…The last person to even talk to Ambassador Stevens, had a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to come forward, present himself as a whistle-blower and tell the truth of what transpired in Benghazi and Triploi that night in September.

GREGORY HICKS FULFILLED HIS MORAL OBLIGATION AND HAS BEEN DEMOTED FOR DOING SO.

And Obama wants to talk about “MORAL OBLIGATIONS?????”

As the Commander in Chief and as the president, Obama has a “MORAL OBLIGATION” not to give aid, comfort or assistance to the enemy in a time of war.

By arming Libyan rebels, al Qaeda and Ansar al-Sharia (al Qaeda by another name) while we remain at war with them in Afghanistan and in the larger War on Terror, Obama completely disregarded his “MORAL OBLIGATION” for acts of TREASON.

And now…Obama says…

“I think we have both a moral obligation and a national security interest in both a) ending the slaughter in Syria and b) ensuring a stable Syria.”

Have Obama’s “MORAL OBLIGATIONS” …Getting our troops out before their job was finished…Led to a stabilized Iraq?

No.

Have Obama’s “MORAL OBLIGATIONS”…telling our enemies when we are leaving… led to a stabilized Afghanistan?

No.

Have Obama’s “MORAL OBLIGATIONS”…backing the Muslim Brotherhood…Led to a stabilized Egypt?

No.

Have Obama’s “MORAL OBLIGATIONS”…backing Hamas and the Palestinian Authority…Led to a stabilized Middle East?

No.

Have Obama’s “MORAL OBLIGATIONS”…Allowing time and space for diplomacy where we have no diplomatic mission whatsoever…Led to a stabilized Iran?

No.

Regardless of his bloviating…the United States has NO…“MORAL OBLIGATION” to interfere in Syria’s civil war and further more…

Considering the track record of Obama’s “MORAL OBLIGATIONS”…THE ENTIRE REGION WOULD FAIR BETTER WITHOUT HIS INTERFERENCE!!!!!

Obama, in the light of what transpired before, during and after the attacks in Benghazi, has no business…NO BUSINESS AT ALL…

Lecturing the American people, congress or ANYONE ELSE ON THIS PLANET regarding “MORAL OBLIGATIONS!!!!!”

And I, for one, would thank him to SHUT UP.  JUST SHUT…THE HELL…UP!!!

PERIOD!!!!!!!