Insanity, according to Einstein, is “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

We already know that Obama is a Pathological Liar.

“A person who lies to the point of it being considered a disease or condition, an abnormally habitual liar.”

A Sociopath

“A sociopath is typically defined as someone who lies incessantly to get their way and does so with little concern for others.  A sociopath is often goal-oriented (i.e., lying is focused – it is done to get one’s way).  Sociopaths have little regard or respect for the rights and feelings of others.  Sociopaths are often charming and charismatic, but they use their talented social skills in manipulative and self-centered ways.”

And a Compulsive Liar

“A compulsive liar is defined as someone who lies out of habit.  Lying is their normal and reflexive way of responding to questions.  Compulsive liars bend the truth about everything, large and small.  For a compulsive liar, telling the truth is very awkward and uncomfortable while lying feels right.  Compulsive lying is usually thought to develop in early childhood, due to being placed in an environment where lying was necessary.  For the most part, compulsive liars are not overly manipulative and cunning (unlike sociopaths), rather they simply lie out of habit.”

Can we now add CERTIFIABLY INSANE to the list?

Obama has let it be known that he intends to arm Syrian “rebels” against Assad.

For those who are prone to asking, “Has he learned NOTHING from Benghazi?”

Save it.

The answer is…YES HE HAS.

He has learned that in arming such “rebels” he can and WILL advance the cause of radical Islam by leaps and bounds.

In Libya, Obama “led from behind” after the French notably led from the front and in doing so, he armed Libyan “rebels” to overthrow Gaddafi.

It worked. Gaddafi ended up dead and sprawled out in a grocery store freezer but, the distinctly critical calls NOT to arm those “rebels” from the right were centered on…”Well, we don’t know who these rebels really are.”

I suspect Obama DID.

After Gaddafi’s downfall, some 20,000 of those weapons, given TO the “rebels” disappeared.

While we have no actual forensic evidence, because the site of the Benghazi attacks was allowed to be scrubbed for 3 weeks before the FBI was allowed in, it’s no stretch of the imagination to believe that many of the weapons used in those attacks, which took the lives of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were…AMERICAN weapons given TO the “rebels.”

We now know exactly who those “rebels” were.

They are Ansar al-Sharia.

That is the name of al Qauda in the Arab Peninsula…Ansar al-Sharia.

We are to this day, at war with al Qaeda and of course were on September 11^th 2012 as well. Therefore, in arming Ansar al-Sharia…Obama in fact, armed our enemy in a time of war.

TREASON plain and simple.

NOW, Obama intends to arm the “rebels” in Syria to overthrow Assad.

Same thing? Expecting a different result?

Half right.

It IS the same thing.

Those “rebels” in Syria are…Ansar al-Sharia…Just as they were in Libya. In fact, there are several different factions of al Qaeda terrorists masquerading as “rebels” or “freedom fighters” in Syria and very few…VERY few…ACTUAL freedom fighters.

Hezbollah is there from Lebanon.  Jabhat al-Nusra is there too.  

In fact, there are some 500 terrorists cells currently fighting in Syria against Assad and many of them are tied to al Qaeda.

Any idea that “rebels” can be armed in Syria without directly or indirectly arming al Qaeda, Ansar al Sharia, Hezbollah, Jabhat al-Nusra or any of the others is ridiculous.

So…It’s the same thing but, is Obama expecting a different result?

To assume that would be as ridiculous as believing Syrian “rebels could be armed without directly or indirectly arming the terrorists.

The plan, by al Qaeda, is to create a power vacuum in Syria, much like the power vacuums we’ve seen develop in Libya, Iraq and Egypt and then fill that vacuum with radical Islam and sharia law by which we, and the rest of the western, non-Muslim world, would be targeted.

The Muslim Brotherhood, after receiving arms, tanks and F-16’s from the United States is now talking about war AGAINST the United States.

According to the NYT: “Unaware that their words were being broadcast live on a state-owned television channel, many of those seated around the table said the dam was in fact a secret American and Israeli plot to undermine Egypt that must be stopped at all costs.”

Then, according to the Times report, Magdi Ahmad Hussein, chairman of the Islamic Labor Party, stated: “I’m very fond of battles. With the enemies, of course – with America and Israel, but this battle must be waged with maximum judiciousness and calm. Even though this is a secret meeting, we must all take an oath not to leak anything to the media, unless it is done officially by sister Pakinam [el-Sharkawy, a Morsi aide]. We need an official plan for popular national security.”

In Libya, arms given to the “rebels” were most certainly turned ON the United States in Benghazi.

In both Iraq and Afghanistan, we train “security” forces only to have THEM turn on is in most decidedly deadly ways.

That too will be the effect of arming Syrian “rebels.”

The United States, and our military personnel, of course are not the ONLY targets.

Israel finds itself in a VERY precarious situation both geographically and ideologically.

Lebanon, Syria, whether under Assad or al Qaeda, Egypt and the Muslim Brotherhood, Iran, whether they back Assad as they do now or utilize an al Qaeda element should Assad fall, all want Israel off the map.

Israel sits between all these different evil factions and the Palestinian Authority, yet ANOTHER Obama backed terrorist organization.

Not to be lost in all of this is the fact that Obama has nominated Samantha Power, Mrs. Cass Sunstein, for the post of U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.

Power is decidedly and outspokenly ANTI-Israel and PRO Palestinian.

Power said in 2002, when asked how she would guide a president should either side of the Israel/Palestine conflict move toward genocide: “It may mean more crucially sacrificing—or investing, I think, more than sacrificing—literally billions of dollars not in servicing Israelis’, you know, military, but actually in investing in the new state of Palestine, in investing billions of dollars it would probably take also to support, I think, what will have to be a mammoth protection force, not of the old, you know, Srebrenica kind or the Rwanda kind, but a meaningful military presence.”

NO rational person would EVER believe that ISRAEL would commit genocide but, when asked the question, Power actually advocated standing with PALESTINE and using the U.S. MILITARY to INVADE ISRAEL.

She never once, in that answer, even considered PALESTINE, with their HEZBOLLAH partners committing genocide against Israel.

THAT is VERY telling.

Iran is actively building a nuclear weapons program. Iran has often expressed a desire to wipe Israel from the map. Hezbollah, with the backing of the Palestinian Authority has it in their CHARTER to kill ALL Jews and the PA itself has steadfastly REFUSED to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist.

By arming Syrian “rebels,” Obama will help, once again, to create a power vacuum in Syria which will, again, be filled by elements of radical Islam, primarily, al Qaeda.

So…Obama is doing the same thing, over and over again and, as the result is always the same, one MUST believe that THEresult IS the DESIRED result.

That being said, how could the result have been different?

Had Obama, in the early days or months of the Syrian civil war, identified and assisted the REAL freedom fighters, those groups with structure and a clear goal of creating a free or at least more diplomatic less Sharia based government in Syria,  there would have been a much better chance for a better result.

Obama, I believe, INSTINCTIVELY passed on that opportunity.

INSTINCTIVELY, because I believe he IS, if not an actual Muslim, at the very least, an ISLAMIC sympathizer.

I believe, because of his exposure to Islam in his youth, he WANTS to be seen BY the ISLAMIC radicals AS a Muslim and therefore, clears the way FOR them at every opportunity. It has been a reoccurring trademark of his entire 4 ½ years in office and a path he set forward in his book, “Audacity of Hope.”

He was talking about Arabs and Pakistanis (Muslims) in the wake of 9/11 and how they were feeling profiled, for lack of a better term and stated:  “I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

Put that quote into the context of the world rather than domestic Muslims after 9/11 and time and time again, in various places in the world, as political winds shifted in ugly directions, EVERY TIME, Obama has sided with radical Islam.

EVERY TIME…So…Obama huggers…DON’T bother telling me that I’m assigning a contrary meaning to that quote from Obama’s book.

What we have is historical reference regarding what I have for years called the Obama Doctrine…A string of what those with a thread of common sense and the ability to distinguish what is or is not best for us and our allies would consider failed policies.

However, if your goal is to do, on the foreign stage, that which is directly OPPOSED to the best interests of the United States and our Allies…The Obama Doctrine has been a screaming success.

Option 1 – Is an Assad government, backed by Iran and Russia a good thing to have in place?

No.

Option 2 – What about a Syria in the hands of radical Islam and al Qaeda?

That is worse, for us and for Israel.

Which option has Obama chosen?

Option – 2.

The same option he chose in Libya, in Egypt, in Afghanistan and in Iraq.

He’s NOT doing the same thing and expecting a DIFFERENT result. He’s doing the same thing and expecting the SAME result.

PERIOD.

Craig Andresen

The National Patriot

Weekend Edition 6/15/13