Today’s lesson in “How to Piss Off a Socialist” is simple…

Tell them that they are only allowed to vote once per socialist per election.

That is essentially exactly what a 5-4 decision from the United States Supreme Court said yesterday.

The law requiring certain states, once solidly blue and now, decidedly red, to provide proof that any changes they want to make to their voting procedures are not racist to the United States Attorney General, the 1965 law, was deemed old, out of date and unconstitutional by the Supremes.

What are socialists gonna do NOW???

Well, let’s see…

Obama said, “I am deeply disappointed with the Supreme Court’s decision today. Today’s decision invalidating one of its core provisions upsets decades of well-established practices that help make sure voting is fair, especially in places where voting discrimination has been historically prevalent.” 

Eric the corrupt and contemptuous Holder stated:

“Today, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in the case of Shelby County v. Holder – and invalidated an essential part of the Voting Rights Act, a cornerstone of American civil rights law.  Like many others across the country, I am deeply disappointed with the Court’s decision in this matter.  This decision represents a serious setback for voting rights – and has the potential to negatively affect millions of Americans across the country.”

Obviously, they both got the “deeply disappointed” talking points memo.

The corrupt and contemptuous Holder went on to vow “swift” action aganst ANY state taking advantage of yesterday’s ruling.

Said holder of the 48 year old restrictions which became unneeded by 1970, “These problems have not been consigned to history,” which is an astounding statement coming from the regime that thinks Benghazi happened “a long time ago.”

And then there was Donna Brazile — the vice-chair for Voter Registration and Participation for the Democratic National Committee fired off an email yesterday, minutes after the ruling became public and stated that the decision is an “injustice” and sounding the false alarm that the voting access “threats are real.”

According to Brazile, “In the last few years, Republicans have dramatically stepped up their efforts to limit voting access. They’ve tried passing restrictive voter ID laws, cutting back early-voting hours, and eliminating same-day voter registration. The list goes on.”

Then, as socialists are want to do, Brazile ended her email with: “Donate now to make sure that Democrats have the resources they need.”

You’re damn right Brazile…Conservatives DO want to restrict voting…TO ONE VOTE PER PERSON AND ONLY FOR THE PERSON LISTED ON VOTER ROLLS!!!!!

Apparently, now that Holder can no longer use the courts to preserve the opportunity for rampant voter fraud, Brazile feels the immediate need to throw other people’s money at the issue.

In his written decision, Chief Justice Roberts stated: “The tests and devices that blocked ballot access have been forbidden nationwide for over 40 years. Yet the Act has not eased (Section 5’s) restrictions or narrowed the scope of (Section 4’s) coverage formula along the way. Instead those extraordinary and unprecedented features have been reauthorized as if nothing has changed, and they have grown even stronger.”

The states effected are, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia. It also covers certain counties in California, Florida, New York, North Carolina and South Dakota and throughout the Obama regime, Holder has labeled any Voter ID laws to be racist and has sued states over and over again for attempting to enact those laws.

The voter ID laws are simple…Voters must show a valid photo ID to vote.

In some cases, states have attempted to discontinue same day voter registration.

And, in almost every state trying to enact such legislation, the states will provide, FREE of charge, a valid photo ID and the STATE will come to those unable to get to THEM.

It’s not a pay to vote OR racist situation as socialists would like you to believe.

It IS a way for poll workers to determine whether or not the person voting actually matches the name on the voter registration.

Imagine that.

States…Wanting to make sure that the voters actually match the name on the roll.

Now, states like Mississippi and Alabama can have their new voter ID laws enacted immediately and clearly, other states will quickly follow.

Congress can, should they choose to do so, rewrite legislation to restrict some states from enacting new voting procedures but, don’t look for that to happen in any short term scenario.

Individual states that enact voter ID laws now are, in effect, diminishing the opportunities for voter fraud by a large degree regardless of which party holds the oval office or the majority in congress and despite the gnashing of socialists teeth over yesterday’s ruling, the playing field is effectively being leveled.

That is exactly the LAST thing socialists wanted.

What THEY wanted…Was to preserve any opportunity for voter fraud.

Minorities, blacks, Hispanics, native Americans and others need to wake the hell up!!!

The same party to which they adhere in great numbers is the exact same party which created the KKK, Jim Crow laws, segregation, and fought against ending slavery.

It’s the exact same party that put into place the very procedures that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 sought to and did eliminate.

It’s the same party that once BLOCKED Civil Rights legislation for YEARS until one of their OWN was in the oval office. Then and ONLY then did liberals adopt the Civil Rights legislation.

Today, they bribe the minorities they held back for so long to vote their way with welfare, entitlements, Obama phones, food stamps and Affirmative Action and more empty promises. At the same time, liberals have used the 1965 Voting Rights Act to manage voter fraud in those effected states.

All the while, telling minorities that THEY and THEY alone stand FOR the minorities.

RUBBISH!!! PURE RUBBISH!!!!!!!

Yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling means that 1965 is long, LONG gone, that things HAVE changed and that the law meant to protect minorities from those…LIBERALS…who were preventing them from voting THEN are NO LONGER NEEDED.

Not coincidentally, those states, in which federal approval was needed to alter voting procedures have turned from the blue 1965 map to red 2013 maps.

Collectively, socialists are coming unglued over yesterday’s decision.

 Minnesota state representative Ryan Winkler, a socialist, tweeted that the 5-4 majority for this decision was nothing but “four accomplices to race discrimination and one Uncle Thomas.”

So against racism is the socialist left that they are calling Justice Clarence Thomas an “UNCLE TOM.”

Tweeted from MSNBC’s Melissa Harris-Perry:  “Damn, that citizenship thing was so great for awhile.”

And Christopher Hayes: “I am slightly surprised by how physically enraged I find myself.”

Here’s the bottom line…

In 1965, liberals were telling minorities, “STICK WITH THE DEMOCRATS BECAUSE ONLY WE CAN MAKE YOUR LIVES BETTER!!!”

Well, yesterday’s liberals are today’s socialists and the “PROGRESSIVE” call to minorities today is…“YOU WERE BETTER OFF IN 1965!!!!!”

Liberals and socialists require racism to control minorities and maintain a voting bloc.

The only group holding minorities on the plantation to do their bidding are yesterday’s liberals and today’s socialists…The REGRESSIVE party.