Weekend Edition: Was the Attack the Cover Up?

It just keeps getting stranger and stranger. By the day, by the hour, almost by the minute, the situation regarding the attack in Benghazi devolves into a rabbit hole of questions Obama and his administration just simply refuse to answer.

Remember when the CNN reporter, 4 days after the terrorist attack, entered the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi and emerged with Ambassador Stevens’ personal journal?

Remember how, for 24 days, we struggled to comprehend how a journalist could get there and roam the grounds but, the FBI was “stuck” in Tripoli because Benghazi was deemed to dangerous a place to be?

Remember how, when the FBI finally DID get to Benghazi, they spent all of 8 hours there…”Gathering evidence” and only 2 of those 8 hours actually AT the Consulate?

Well, yesterday we learned yet ANOTHER seemingly off the wall bit of information.

On October 26th, AFTER the FBI had supposedly been to the Consulate, 2 reporters,  Harald Doornbos and Jenan Moussa from Foreign Policy Magazine, entered the Consulate and what, to their astonished eyes, did THEY find???

Sensitive documents strewn about what remained of the building.

Seriously.

WHAT IN THE HELL IS GOING ON???

Some of those documents outlined concerns by Sean Smith, who died in the attack, regarding the lack of security and the fact that Libyan police who were to have been guarding the Consulate had been, of all things, taking pictures OF the Consulate from a building across the street and, as is now being reported, had actually taken photos of the INSIDE of the Consulate.

Listen. One need not be a rocket scientist to figure this out.

Those photos were being given to those who engineered the attack, Ansar al-Sharia, to help them plan out their strategy FOR the attack.

Here’s what just plain DOESN’T figure.

After an attack that lasted HOURS, after the Consulate being set ablaze, after the CNN team entered and found the journal…AFTER 24 DAYS WITHOUT AN AMERICAN IN SIGHT…And AFTER the FBI had been there to search for evidence…

SENSITIVE DOCUMENTS, COPIES OF CABLES AND EMAILS SENT TO WASHINGTON…are found scattered about???

Nothing about this whole thing in Benghazi passes the smell test but, it’s starting to stink UPwind.

It’s nearly IMPOSSIBLE to believe that the FBI could have been inside that Consulate and NOT found and gathered such documents.

Isn’t that exactly what they were there to do…If indeed they were EVER there at all?

This, of course, adds to the upwind stench and the growing list of questions.

In the 2 days following the attacks, all U.S. personnel were evacuated from Benghazi to Germany.

That would include all U.S. personnel who were at the annex.

That would be the…CIA ANNEX.

So, outside of reporters, Benghazi was American free for 24 days.

We now know, because of documents and cables unearthed by intrepid Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge, that on the very day OF the attack, communications were sent by Ambassador Stevens detailing the urgent need for more security. We also now know, again because of Catherine Herridge, that less than a moth PRIOR to the attack, Stevens sent a detailed plea for help and named 10 different terrorist factions which had taken control OF Benghazi and THAT list included those now directly linked TO the attacks…Ansar al-Sharia.

So, for 24 days, the Consulate and everything inside it was free for the taking by those who would want nothing more than sensitive documents belonging to the United States.

No United States Marines were sent to secure the Consulate or the annex AFTER the attack and, we now know that any call for help or military quick response team ready do deliver that help was ordered to STAND DOWN…DURING the 7 hour attack.

In fact, a Foreign Emergency Support Team with a Special Ops Command element, routinely deployed in instances where a site needs to be secured and an investigation  done…WAS NOT SENT EITHER DURING OR AFTER THE ATTACK.

Such a team would have ushered in the FBI and the investigation could have begun on September 12th.

And yet, there, scattered about the building, on October 26th, were sensitive documents?

Last Saturday, in the Weekend Edition, I called and detailed this as treason.

A couple of days ago, as more and more information was uncovered by Catherine Herridge and Jennifer Griffen at Fox News, I stated that those who died were set up to die.

Now, given the most recent revelations, I will take this whole thing a step beyond.

This whole stinky thing smacks of a very, VERY high level covert operation of which neither the CIA nor the FBI are involved.

We know weapons were being run out of the Consulate and there are reports that Ambassador Stevens was involved in that aspect. It is believe that he met with a Turkish diplomat on the evening of 9-11 for that very purpose.

Hours later, Ambassador Stevens and Communications assistant Sean Smith were dead.

Hours after that, the man who disobeyed the stand down orders and another who joined the fight at the annex, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were also dead.

Oddly, only the Navy Seal who went to the Consulate and his fellow Navy Seal were killed at the annex…An annex which now housed its own staff and approximately 20 or so people rescued by Woods from the Consulate.

Why?

Why just those 2?

At the Consulate, ONLY Ambassador Stevens and his communications specialist, Sean Smith were killed.

Why just THOSE 2???

Why was the Consulate presented to our enemies as such an easy but high value target?

We now know that, on the very day he died, Stevens did not trust the Libyans who were there, supposedly to protect him as he sent a cable, that day, to Washington as a warning.

Obviously, Stevens was not engaged in covert activity with the Libyans or he would not have feared them.

Could Stevens have been an unwilling participant in the gun running scandal? Could he have been on the verge of blowing the whistle? Is that what he told the Turk he met with that fateful night?

Was the Turk working with Ansar al-Sharia?

Could the Turk have called in the strike as he left the Consulate that night?

We have what surely is treason, we do have a cover-up and now, it certainly is starting to smell of a very, VERY highly orchestrated covert operation.

Adding to all of this is the screaming silence from Obama, his administration and his campaign.

And to think, that for weeks, they thought they could pass this off as the spontaneous result of a stupid You Tube video.

It’s beginning to look like the video story was a fabrication to provide cover for the initial cover-up…The attack…which was meant to eliminate key players in a deeply covert operation. Had the stand down orders NOT been issued, there was a chance that at least SOME of those killed may have lived to tell their story.

I know this is disturbing and deeply so and I also know it delves into an area, conspiracy theory, where I don’t like to go but, knowing what we now know and, perhaps more importantly, knowing what we DON’T know, we are left in the silence of those who must tell the truth to try and piece this together.

I can tell you this, at this point, were I Fox News, I would be providing high level protection for their investigative team. I feel they are on the verge of discoveries that will be both shocking and put them in danger.

Why?

Because they are delving into a story which includes willful acts of treason and a situation where Americans were purposefully allowed to die and given what those responsible are already responsible for, a couple of reporters getting closer and closer to the truth are as expendable to them as were an Ambassador, a communications specialist and 2 former Navy Seals working for the CIA.

Craig Andresen

The National Patriot

Weekend Edition 11/3/12

11 thoughts on “Weekend Edition: Was the Attack the Cover Up?

  1. Well thought out and so many questions that aren’t being asked… but a few more:
    WHO came up with the story of the video to use? We only hear that story from the President, Secretary of State and others at the highest level. There is no mention from any of the email communications or from the current Libyan leader who said on Sept. 12, it was a terrorist attack. Have the staff members from both the consulate and annex been questioned? Why did it take Republican Senators to get access to the prisoner that the Tunisian government is holding?

  2. Thanks Craig for helping piece this thing together. God pray that every voter will think about Benghazi when standing in the voter booth about to choose our next President. God Bless Gov. Romney and God Bless the USA. Please pray for this great nation.

    This is off topic, but does Bronco Bama look like he may have aids? He looks thin, frail and he just does not look well. Is anyone else seeing this?

  3. Congressional investigations my backside, regular citizens have been insulated for far to long to understand what is at stake, if they did they would have already marched on DC. The American population that comes close to understanding is hoping for a Romney win and they are hoping he will have the will to turn back the tide but the level of effort it is going to take is not determined by mitt it IS determined by our adversary, they are about to show their hand and they are desperate, that makes them immensely dangerous and by their recent actions they are ruthless, is mitt? That doesn’t mean mitt has to be hateful but his level of determination MUST BE GREATER than our adversary. This will take ALL available resources and tactics ie water boarding, stressful interrogation of all involved including socialist congressmen in our own house. Do you think mitt has it in him is their a David in mitt?

  4. Have you read Doug Haggmans articles from Canada Free Press? He too is on the same page except for the fact that he involves Putin, as he has said that Syria is his tipping point. Now what if we were arming anti-Assad rebels? He theroizes that Stevens met with his Turkish counterpart that night so he could relay they had been caught by Russia and Russia had areial photos of the gunrunning operation from the post Gaddafi cache’, through Turkey and into Syria. Now think about that and I belive it all makes sense.

  5. Obama had a plan to ultimately destroy us. he wants the secular dictator of Syria and the Shi’ite mullahs of Iran out of the way so he can make way for another inept genocider caliphate. But, that will take a war with Iran. And that will happen when the Iranians stupidly take the bite to attack Israel. The US will be forced to defend the Israelis and thats when Russia will come to the aid of Iran. the Russian high command hates the US and would love to lop a bomb on NYC. and so would Obama. Obama and his leftist masters want to crush the USA. Obama is truly the anti-christ ; born and bred by the left for this evil grand finale.

  6. I’ve always thought this was gun-running for Muslim Brotherhood & Humas. There was a piece written early on about a ship in Turkey that had just docked with about 400tuns of weapons and perhaps the Turk that came to talk to Stevens was delivering that message. Arms for Syria to use against Israel. Good job on this report. Thanks

  7. Felt from beginning the tape that was blamed was at the ready to be used as cover in that no one over there was even that much aware of it – only O and co.

  8. Dont you think it would be useful for Congress to question those 20 staff members? That would provide a more adequate timeline than the skewed one the CIA is presenting. Jennifer and Catherine’s reporting on this has been nothing short of remarkable! Thank goodness there are a few journalists with integrity out there! I pray for their safety

  9. Nice info my friend.

    In the first days after the attack, I have found that Stevens was “send” by obama back to Benghazi to take care the gun dealing issue, Stevens has been a very important key roll in this exchange of weapons with fascist islamics, must like the middle men between obama and the extremist.

    Also got info on those day’s that the CIA annex was not part of the consulate detail and Woods was actually investigating the moving of Stevens in the gun dealing, reason why they were there.
    Now, we know that investigations are doing by partners and what happen if Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were actually partners in this investigations and knew to much?
    A seal is going to be a seal no matter what… the fact that at least for almost 2 hours the consulate is attack and no one is send for their rescue except orders to stand down, one can only use common sense and understand that the intent was to kill no matter what Ambassador Stevens… provably knowing how the Seals are training and known that Woods has ask already for permission is not to hard to find what took place later.

    I can’t not imagine the ordeal, the feelings of this brave men ( don’t even think that Stevens was so brave, I believe he was too corrupt and got cut in his own filthy actions ) to fight for what was right while this traitors were looking life how everything unfold, provably they let happen and go to bed with in empty room of a table and share as silence witness.

    Great post thanks.

  10. It’s one big mess. We have a potus trying to cover up “yet another gun-running scandal” while his people are before the oversight committee trying to explain why they look so stupid. My husband watched the videos, day before yesterday, and were astonished at the imbeciles replies to questions.

Comments are closed.