By Craig Andresen and Diane Sori Right Side Patriots on American Patriots Broadcasting Network
It’s been less than two weeks since the Islamic terrorist attack in San Bernardino and new information regarding the 7th century barbarians who carried out that attack continues to roll in.
What we are learning about the two Islamists is alarming but there is more, much more to it than the revelations coming to light about Malik and Farook but before we get into that, let’s take stock in what information has been uncovered so far.
Malik, the female Islamic barbarian came to the United States from Saudi Arabia just a year ago on a K1 visa which is more commonly known as a ‘fiancée visa’ and according to government sources, it is one of the hardest visas to obtain as the vetting process for it is reportedly the most vigorous.
We also now know that Malik was “radicalized” prior to her ever coming to our country and that her “radicalization” more than likely took place in Islamabad, Pakistan years ago. Malik was, according to documents, one of only 519 Pakistanis to have obtained a K1 visa in 2014 and one of only 35,925 to have received such a visa overall in 2014 and that number comprises only 0.3% of all visas handed out that year.
Early on in the investigation, it was reported that Farook, the male half of the Islamic terrorist connection was “radicalized” by Malik but that has now been replaced by reports indicating that Farook began the process of being “radicalized” long before he ever met Malik. Farook, it now appears, was “radicalized” here at home.
We know that Malik, as per Islamic ideology, was not employed and that Farook had an income of $51,000 per year so, the some $30,000 plus worth of guns, ammo and IED supplies, seemed out of line with his income fueling speculation that the Islamic barbarian couple had some source of outside funding. It now appears that they maxed out their credit lines, including the taking out of a $28,500 loan from the on-line lender, Prosper, who issued this statement: “All loans originated through the Prosper platform are subject to all identity verification and screening procedures required by law, including U.S. anti-terrorism and anti-money laundering laws. Like all Americans, Prosper is shocked and saddened by recent events in San Bernardino.”
We have learned that Farook and Malik had been planning their Islamic terrorist attack for nearly a year and that Farook had apparently planned an earlier attack, back in 2012…at least a year before he ever met Malik but was “spooked” by a sweep of Islamic terrorist suspects by law enforcement in Southern California back then and scrapped his plan at that time.
There have now been two witnesses who have come forward to say they saw both Malik and Farook at a Riverside, California gun range, practicing their aim and shooting at paper targets for the past year and even in the days before their Islamic terrorist attack of less than two weeks ago.
We know that the two Islamists purchased thousands of rounds of ammunition and enough supplies to build dozens of IED devices and that the two Islamists purchased two handguns legally, and that a friend, Enrique Marquez, who is in the process of converting to Islam purchased two rifles that he either gave or sold to the Islamic terrorist couple.
Investigators are now looking at Malik’s past and suspect that she had been an Islamic terror operative for years. Investigators are also now looking at her family’s ties to terrorism including her possible contacts with Al Qaeda’s Syrian arm, al-Nusra, and her possible connection to the known radical Red Mosque in Pakistan. And let’s not forget that, during the Islamic terrorist attacks, Malik posted to Facebook that she had pledged her allegiance to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
Here’s something else we now know…a report that was quickly removed from the headlines…that being the fact that San Bernardino law enforcement officials knew, within five minutes of the Islamic terrorist attack, exactly who was responsible. Yes, they were tipped off by survivors of the attack, but according to reports, Farook was a person of interest to local law enforcement before the attack and that San Bernardino police had been wanting to talk to Farook.
As if all of this isn’t bad enough…now it gets downright chilling.
According to Farook’s father…Syed Farook, the Islamic terrorist was a supporter of ISIS and that he believed Israel should be wiped from the map.
According to CV Claverie, a friend of Nicholas Thalasinos, a coworker of Farook’s who was shot and killed by Farook and Malik last week in San Bernardino, Farook had told Thalasinos that, “Islam will rule the world,” and that Farook had, for some time, been threatening Thalasinos…telling him that, “Christians and Jews deserve to die; and that he (Nicholas) was going to die.”
Perhaps the reason San Bernardino police wanted to talk to Farook, in the days before the Islamic terrorist attack, had something to do with these threats against his coworker and maybe, just maybe the reason police hesitated was because, in a world where the cops are labeled as bigots of one sort or another, and in a world where political correctness is more important than the rule of law, having contact with a Muslim, regarding potential terroristic threats, is seen as prejudiced.
It was clear that Farook and his Islamist wife had intended to do more than just commit murder at the Christmas party, and now we have learned that the terrorist had several photos of Carter High School in Rialto on his cell phone, and we know the pair had enough ammunition and pipe bombs to have wreaked havoc on any second location they chose. While it wasn’t out of the ordinary for Farook, a county health inspector, to take photos during inspections and area schools were on his work orders, according to investigators, it would have been highly unusual for any inspector to photograph the outside of any building and Farook’s photos of Carter High School were, indeed, of the outside of the building.
Now, the Department of Homeland Security is reviewing the K1 visa program, “to assess possible program enhancements,” and as Marc Rosenblum, the Deputy Director of the U.S. Immigration Policy Program at the Migration Policy Center put it… “This visa has been totally under the radar. The issue of marriage fraud has definitely gotten a lot of attention, just not as a security vulnerability.”
Everything listed above, everything we now know after the fact, after the Islamic terrorist attack in San Bernardino less than two weeks ago should have been a waving red flag…waving red crescent flags…flags that should have stopped what happened years before it happened but, while the portrait of the Islamist 7th century barbarians, Farook and Malik, is beyond chilling…seemingly, nobody noticed.
Clearly, Islamic terrorism is the number one threat to the world and to our lives in this country and it has been since at least September 11th, 2001 and while we’ve been told that procedures and processes are in place to protect us, with evidence that many such attacks have been prevented…how could this have happened? How could these two Islamic terrorists throw up one red crescent flag after another, for years on end, while making personal threats against the lives of American citizens and yet nobody notices and nobody does one single thing to prevent it?
Obama tells us that his strategy, a strategy of being nice to Islam, is working, and if you think that will change under any different liberal regime, think again as Hillary Clinton has told us that we must respect and understand our enemies. Respect and understand those who wish us dead? That will persuade them to seek a different path? We are supposed to respect and understand the ilk of Farook and Malik…understand why they murdered 14 and wounded another 21 in an Islamic terrorist attack?
Here’s what we understand…there is no religion on earth, engaged globally, in acts of murder and genocide and destruction of those who do not adhere to that religion. Not the Christians. Not the Jews. Not the Sikhs, not the Hindus nor any other however, there is one particular political ideology that is committing mass murders, beheadings, burning people alive and bombing any and all who don’t adhere to its political ideology…Islam.
Another fact worth noting would be that while not all Muslims are Islamist terrorists…all Islamist terrorists are Muslims but there are also differences in the political ideologies here in our country.
The liberal ideology is that Islam is a religion and therefore, must be tolerated and coddled. The Conservative ideology is that Islam is not a religion but a political ideology which cannot be tolerated. While it is politically incorrect to believe that Islam is anything but a religion, in liberal circles…it is factually correct to see it for what it truly is…an ideology of death, destruction and genocide.
We are simply left with two possibilities. Either the system, the protocols, the procedures and the processes in place to keep Islamic terrorists from perpetrating acts the likes of which were in play in San Bernardino are broken at best or non-existent at worst and something needs to be done or…they are working but were, in the case of San Bernardino…ignored.
Under the Obama regime, we have been living in a land where Republicans are seen as a more dangerous enemy than Islamists the ilk of Farook and Malik and where Conservative groups are more heavily vetted than potential Islamist barbarians. We live in a land where every keystroke we make is recorded, where if we search for an item on Google, ads for that item become part of our Facebook feed and every phone call we make is tracked and yet, the San Bernardino Islamist barbarians spent years preparing for their terrorist attack and nobody did a thing. How could this be?
We believe that under the Obama regime, key players within our intel community have been ordered to virtually stand down where possible cases of terrorism and terrorist attacks are concerned, and we believe such orders could only come from the top. Is it possible that Obama is such a narcissistic, arrogant SOB as to believe that so long as he’s running the show, his fellow Islamists won’t act on their inbred barbaric impulses?
This is Obama we’re talking about…sure it’s possible and what’s equally as plausible is the notion that Islam’s war council no longer views Obama as useful to the agenda of building the caliphate due to two major events. First, Iran got from Obama what it needed, the green light to build a nuclear arsenal and just last week, they again flaunted it in Obama’s face by testing yet another ballistic missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead in direct violation of the terms of the treaty Obama is so damned proud of.
ISIS sees Iran as their competition and/or their enemy in ruling the hoped-for future caliphate and they can’t be happy that Iran now has the power of the bomb.
Second…Obama’s glaring inability to have prevented Putin from going all in against ISIS in Syria.
Obama has been propping up ISIS in Syria and in Iraq by employing the tactic of bombing empty warehouses and the occasional truck convoy while lying to the American people, claiming that he has ISIS contained and on the run which sounds a whole lot like the crap he was telling us regarding al-Qaeda before the 2012 election. Obama has also been arming various ISIS loyal factions in Syria and allowed ISIS free run of Iraq and access to whatever weapons or war we left behind when Obama pulled our military out of Iraq.
Another key indicator, we believe, can be found in Obama’s speech to the nation after San Bernardino…it smacked of desperation. Not since 2010 had Obama delivered a speech from the oval office but, if what we suspect is true, he no longer felt he was in control and needed some way to add gravitas to his speech. Obama repeated the moniker ISIL, over and over again during that speech in an obvious signal to ISIS that he still has their backs and in what could be described as a desperate plea for them to have his.
While Obama’s love affair with ISIS may not be over…it seems that maybe ISIS’ love affair with Obama is, as it seems virtually impossible, with all the protocols and processes we, as a nation, have in place, good, bad or indifferent, that our intel community failed to see all the red flags flying around the San Bernardino Islamic terrorists, and the speed with which background information regarding their exploits has been flooding in seems to confirm that said information was already close at hand.
While we believe profiling is a valuable tool against Islamic terrorism, and one that is most likely already in play, we wouldn’t put it passed Obama to threaten members of the intel community with charges of racism should they divulge its use. It should be noted that profiling, in regards to Islamic terrorism is not racial in nature but ideological and psychological as Islam is an ideology rife with psychosis and not a race but that’s not how liberals see it and certainly not how the race-card playing Obama sees it.
What we believe is that our intel community knew a great deal about the San Bernardino Islamic terrorists well before the attack on December 2nd and we believe they failed to act against the terrorists based on Obama’s orders…not to say that Obama knew specifically of the pending attack but that he had made it clear that Muslims, despite their red flags, were to be given a free pass because, covertly, he had a deal with the absolute worst that Islam has to offer in that he, Obama, would allow safe passage and safe haven to as many Islamists as possible in return for a promise that the sort of attacks of 9/11 or the Charlie Hebdo and Paris concert hall attacks would not happen here as long as he was running the show.
Obama, in his oval office speech, looked and sounded, for all the world, like a man who’s grand plan was crashing down around him…like the man behind the curtain as it was being drawn back to reveal that he is not wizard…not a wizard at all.
In tomorrow’s Part 2 of our investigative report ‘Obama’s Deal With the Devil’ we will expose facts about who this man really is and why he truly is dancing with the islamic devils.